多学科协作下路径护理对老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析肌少症患者的效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20240809-02007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨多学科协作下路径护理对老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析肌少症患者自护能力和生活质量的影响。方法　选取2021年5月至2023年10月于周口市中心医院就诊的70例老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析肌少症患者进行随机对照试验。采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组，各35例。对照组男16例，女19例，年龄（65.64±5.76）岁，病程（5.47±1.38）个月，透析时间（8.18±1.74）个月。观察组男17例，女18例，年龄（66.87±5.42）岁，病程（5.64±1.23）个月，透析时间（8.96±1.74）个月。对照组实施常规护理，观察组实施多学科协作下路径护理。两组均干预3个月。比较两组患者干预前后血糖和肾功能指标、肌肉和运动能力、生活质量和自护能力以及激惹、抑郁和焦虑量表（IDA）评分。采用t检验进行统计分析。结果　干预后，观察组空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白_、血肌酐水平和尿蛋白/肌酐比值分别为（8.05±0.62）mmol/L、（7.25±0.42）%、（54.89±13.37）μmol/L、（58.46±3.52）ml/min，对照组分别为（8.96±0.47）mmol/L、（8.12±0.64）%、（75.06±14.49）μmol/L、（55.63±2.64）ml/min，差异均有统计学意义（t=6.920、6.724、6.052、3.805，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组日常步行速度、优势手握力分别为（1.26±0.33）m/s、（25.34±3.24）kg，对照组分别为（1.02±0.27）m/s、（22.38±2.76）kg，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.330、4.114，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组世界卫生组织生存质量测定简表、自我护理能力测定简表评分均高于对照组［（56.46±6.38）分比（48.63±5.91）分、（135.36±13.54）分比（126.35±13.45）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=5.326、2.793，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组负性情绪4个维度（外向刺激、内向刺激、焦虑、抑郁）得分及总分均低于对照组［（4.32±1.44）分比（5.16±1.33）分、（4.25±1.52）分比（5.45±1.46）分、（7.21±1.56）分比（8.36±1.37）分、（6.61±1.35）分比（8.15±1.32）分、（21.56±3.27）分比（25.62±2.96）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.535、3.368、3.277、4.825、5.446，均P<0.05）。结论　多学科协作下路径护理有助于改善老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析肌少症患者血糖和肾功能，促进体能恢复，提高患者生活质量和临床自护能力，减少负性情绪。

关键词:

糖尿病肾病, 多学科协作, 维持性血液透析, 肌少症, 自护能力

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the effect of multidisciplinary collaborative care on self-care ability and quality of life in elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy and sarcopenia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Methods　Seventy elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy and sarcopenia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at Zhoukou Central Hospital from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected for the randomized controlled trial, and were divided into a control group and an observation group by the random number table method, with 35 cases in each group. There were 16 men and 19 women in the control group; they were (65.64±5.76) years old; their disease course was (5.47±1.38) months; their dialysis time was (8.18±1.74) months. There were 17 men and 18 women in the observation group; they were (66.87±5.42) years old; their disease course was (5.64±1.23) months; their dialysis time was (8.96±1.74) months. The control group took routine nursing care, while the observation group multidisciplinary collaborative care. Both groups were intervened for 3 months. The blood glucose and renal function indicators, muscle and exercise ability, quality of life, self-care ability, and scores of Irritability, Depression, and Anxiety Scale (IDA) were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention by t test. Results　After the intervention, the levels of fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and serum creatinine and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio in the observation group were better than those in the control group [(8.05±0.62) mmol/L vs. (8.96±0.47) mmol/L, (7.25±0.42)% vs. (8.12±0.64)%, (54.89±13.37) μmol/L vs. (75.06±14.49) μmol/L, and (58.46±3.52) ml/min vs. (55.63±2.64) ml/min], with statistical differences (t=6.920, 6.724, 6.052, and 3.805; all P<0.05). After the intervention, the daily walking speed and hand grip strength in the observation group were better than those in the control group [(1.26±0.33) m/s vs. (1.02±0.27) m/s and (25.34±3.24) kg vs. (22.38±2.76) kg], with statistical differences (t=3.330 and 4.114; both P<0.05). After the intervention, the scores of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief and Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (56.46±6.38 vs. 48.63±5.91 and 135.36±13.54 vs. 126.35±13.45), with statistical differences (t=5.326 and 2.793; both P<0.05). After the intervention, the scores of outward stimulation, inward stimulation, anxiety, and depression and total score of negative emotions in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (4.32±1.44 vs. 5.16±1.33, 4.25±1.52 vs. 5.45±1.46, 7.21±1.56 vs. 8.36±1.37, 6.61±1.35 vs. 8.15±1.32, and 21.56±3.27 vs. 25.62±2.96), with statistical differences (t=2.535, 3.368, 3.277, 4.825, and 5.446; all P<0.05). Conclusion　Multidisciplinary collaborative care for elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy and sarcopenia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis can improve their renal function, blood glucose, quality of life, and clinical self-care ability, promote their physical recovery, and reduce their negative emotions.

Key words:

Diabetic nephropathy, , Multidisciplinary collaboration, , Maintenance hemodialysis, Sarcopenia, Self-care ability

郭志梅王明明.

多学科协作下路径护理对老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析肌少症患者的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(2): 208-213.

Guo Zhimei, Wang Mingming.

Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative care for elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy and sarcopenia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(2): 208-213.

参考文献

[1] Almalki MH, Ahmad MM, Brema I, et al. Management of diabetes insipidus following surgery for pituitary and suprasellar tumours [J]. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, 2021, 21(3): 354-364. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.4.2021.010.
[2] 王燕,孟秀凤,常清,等. 中年2型糖尿病病人肌少症患病情况及其对再入院的影响[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(3):532-535. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.03.044.
[3] 陈管洁,张海林,尹丽霞,等.维持性血液透析合并肌少症患者运动干预方案的构建及应用[J].中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(7):798-806. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022. 07.005.
[4] 范彩英,邹秀梅,刘腾飞,等. 多学科协作下路径护理对急性脑梗死患者自护能力及康复效果的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(16):2214-2219. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20201228-06918.
[5] 郭思若, 张爱华. 糖尿病肾病的诊断及鉴别诊断[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2017, 16(10): 750-752. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.10.002.
[6] 姜珊,康琳,刘晓红. 2019亚洲肌少症诊断及治疗共识解读[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 373-376. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2020.04.002.
[7] 李海鹏, 刘宇, 黄灵燕, 等. EWGSOP共识在上海市70～79岁社区老年女性肌肉衰减症研究中的应用[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(6):506-512. DOI: 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2017.06.007
[8] 罗晓蓉, 青丽彬, 卢元明. 骨骼肌指数和手握力对亚急性期老年脑梗死病人短期功能恢复的影响[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2021, 19(23): 4171-4173. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2021.23.038.
[9] 冀磊磊, 阚秀丽, 洪永锋, 等. 站立位髋关节强化训练对脑卒中恢复期患者平衡和步行功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(7): 868-870. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1001-1242.2020.07.020.
[10] 刘怡均, 林向英, 张燕. 中文版世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表用于终末期肾病的信效度验证[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 635-641. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006- 7795.2021.04.020.
[11] 董文平,王秀芳.基于医联体的"医院-社区-家庭"延续护理平台在COPD患者中的应用[J].国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(10): 1916-1920. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370- 20200417-00556.
[12] 袁勇贵,沈鑫华,吴爱勤,等.激惹、抑郁和焦虑量表(IDA)的信度和效度研究[J].四川精神卫生, 2002, 15(1):11-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3256.2002.01.004.
[13] 郭正勇,赵观进,张宇,等. 羟苯磺酸钙联合氯沙坦钾片治疗早期糖尿病肾病的临床研究[J]. 实用医学杂志,2020,36(1):94-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.01.018.
[14] Atila C, Loughrey PB, Garrahy A, et al. Central diabetes insipidus from a patient's perspective: management, psychological co-morbidities, and renaming of the condition: results from an international web-based survey[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022, 10(10): 700-709. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00219-4.
[151] 李颖.老年2型糖尿病患者肌少症与髋部几何结构的关系及其影响因素探讨[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2020. DOI: 10.27674/d.cnki.gcyku.2020.000211.
[16] 陈萱,陈敏,赵金文,等.终末期肾脏病行维持性血液透析患者发生肌少症的相关影响因素分析[J].国际泌尿系统杂志, 2024, 44(3): 385-389. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460- 20231215-00097.
[17] 熊娜,张金亮,欧阳吁,等.多学科协作诊疗模式下胎儿胸腔积液临床诊疗及转归[J].国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(19):2714-2718. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2022.19.011.
[18] 李海虹,谢文超,梁世球,等.多学科协作诊疗管理模式对高倍率病案发生率的影响[J].中国医药导报, 2023, 20(35): 194-197. DOI: 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.35.43.
[19] 葛兆霞,邓小岚,倪洁,等. 多学科团队协作干预在超高龄肌少症患者中的应用与评价[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2020,36(4):241-246. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088. 2020.04.001.
[20] 贾春晓,荆瑾,侯盛菲,等.老年2型糖尿病合并肌少症患者运动干预的研究进展[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2023,30(9):8-13. DOI:10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2023.26.003.
[21] 陈拉斯,王婷婷,李来梅. 复方血栓通胶囊对老年糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析的治疗效果及作用机制[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2021,41(14):3009-3013. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1005-9202.2021.14.030.
[22] 汤锦美,胡登科. 医学营养治疗和膳食护理干预对早期老年糖尿病肾病临床转归的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(6):769-772. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245. 2020.06.009.
[23] 郭月月,薄祥敏,刘胜凤,等.健身气功五禽戏在透析患者肌少症运动康复中的应用研究[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(20):1865-1869. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx. 2023. 20.009.
[24] 蔡淑兰,贾红光,张素英,等.有氧运动对糖尿病肾病血液透析患者氧化应激及生存质量的影响[J].华北理工大学学报(医学版), 2018, 20(1): 21-24. DOI: 10.19539/j.cnki. 2095-2694.2018.01.005.
[25] 徐洁琼,李维辛. 老年糖尿病相关性衰弱、肌少症发病机制及干预的研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2018,58(37):109-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2018.37.032.

[1]	邢文华梁栋刘洁李梦洁张晓敏. 线粒体动力学在糖尿病肾病中的作用及调节机制 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(2): 183-187.
[2]	姜萍余赵璧. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦对维持性血液透析伴高血压患者的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(2): 270-273.
[3]	王贺黄海群资青兰. 基于Web of Science肝硬化肌少症研究热点及趋势的可视化分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(9): 1440-1445.
[4]	马利军刘占军韩继明. miR-150-5p、miR-135b在糖尿病肾病患者中的表达及意义 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(9): 1454-1459.
[5]	张媛陈新娟王青青吴玲玲. 产后出血MDT急救模拟培训在产科实习医师教学中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(9): 1547-1551.
[6]	刘睿茜杨阳高金祥. 应用托伐普坦治疗糖尿病肾病综合征所致顽固性水肿个案分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1172-1176.
[7]	温俊萍周艳颜彭晓辉. 5E护理模式在糖尿病肾病患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 793-796.
[8]	周静阮丽平高梦崔菲. 跟进式赋能教育在结直肠癌化疗患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 871-875.
[9]	陈颖段爽莉李丽. 达格列净联合德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液治疗血糖控制欠佳糖尿病肾病患者的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(23): 4009-4014.
[10]	唐丽君陈金辉刘亮肖旑莉. 护士为主导的多学科协作管理模式对喉癌患者术后生存质量的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(23): 4033-4037.
[11]	张敏郭佳王燕斐. 以故事理论为基础的护理干预对强直性脊柱炎患者自护能力的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(22): 3857-3861.
[12]	魏小燕王美荣张群芳曾志奎. 循经点穴疗法联合耳穴贴压在维持性血液透析患者中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(21): 3685-3688.
[13]	周密李建锋余斐. 超声引导下球囊扩张术在尿毒症维持性血液透析患者动静脉内瘘狭窄治疗中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(15): 2553-2557.
[14]	雷亚莉李曼刘晓荣赵喜荣. 多学科协作分层急救护理对心律失常致心搏骤停患者的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(15): 2606-2612.
[15]	张博许岭平封琳李小花. 多学科协作下的阶段性康复训练对置入起搏器患者术后心功能的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(14): 2332-2337.