Analysis of influencing factors of CD-RISC score after interventional
therapy for intracranial aneurysms

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.24.005

Abstract

Abstract: Objective　To analyze the influencing factors of Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) score after interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms and its relationship with simple coping style. Methods　A total of 80 patients with intracranial aneurysms after interventional therapy in Liaocheng Third People's Hospital from October 2018 to November 2021 were selected, including 34 males and 46 females, aged (58.63±7.62) years. General data questionnaire, Perceptive Social Support Scale (PSSS), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and CD-RISC were used to conduct a questionnaire survey. The factors affecting the patients' CD-RISC score were analyzed by single factor analysis, and the factors with statistically significant differences were assigned and were further analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Independent sample t test and one-way analysis of variance were used for the measurement data. Results　The CD-RISC score in patients with intracranial aneurysms after interventional therapy was (63.52±5.95), which was at a medium level. There were statistically significant differences in the CD-RISC score among patients with different postoperative complications, psychological nursing, social support, positive coping SCSQ score, and negative coping SCSQ score (all P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that postoperative complications (β=-2.983, P<0.05), psychological nursing (β=3.427, P<0.05), social support (β=4.251, P<0.05), positive coping SCSQ score (β=2.154, P<0.05), and negative coping SCSQ score (β=-2.476, P<0.05) were the influencing factors of CD-RISC score. Conclusions　The psychological resilience in patients with intracranial aneurysms after interventional therapy is at a medium level. Postoperative complications, psychological nursing, social support, positive coping SCSQ score, and negative coping SCSQ score are the influencing factors of CD-RISC score after interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms. Medical staff should pay attention to the relevant influencing factors and formulate the targeted nursing measures to improve the prognosis.

Key words: Intracranial aneurysms, Interventional therapy, Psychological resilience, Coping style

摘要： 目的　分析颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后心理弹性量表（CD-RISC）评分的影响因素及其与简易应对方式的关系。方法　选取聊城市第三人民医院2018年10月至2021年11月颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后患者80例，男34例，女46例，年龄（58.63±7.62）岁。采用一般资料问卷、领悟社会支持量表（PSSS）、简易应对方式问卷（SCSQ）、CD-RISC进行问卷调查，单因素分析影响患者CD-RISC评分的因素，对差异有统计学意义的因素赋值进行多元线性回归分析。计量资料采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析。结果　颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后患者CD-RISC评分为（63.52±5.95）分，处于中等水平。不同术后并发症、心理护理、社会支持、积极应对SCSQ评分、消极应对SCSQ评分的患者CD-RISC评分差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。多元线性回归分析发现，术后并发症（β=-2.983，P<0.05）、心理护理（β=3.427，P<0.05）、社会支持（β=4.251，P<0.05）、积极应对SCSQ评分（β=2.154，P<0.05）、消极应对SCSQ评分（β=-2.476，P<0.05）均为CD-RISC评分的影响因素。结论　颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后患者心理弹性处于中等水平，术后并发症、心理护理、社会支持、积极应对SCSQ评分、消极应对SCSQ评分是颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后CD-RISC评分的影响因素，医护人员应重视相关影响因素，并制定针对性护理措施，以改善预后。

关键词: 颅内动脉瘤, 介入治疗, 心理弹性, 应对方式

Zhao Nan, Li Hui, Kong Xiangzhi, Chang Liguo. Analysis of influencing factors of CD-RISC score after interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(24): 3431-.

赵楠李辉孔祥之常立国. 颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后心理弹性量表评分的影响因素分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(24): 3431-.

References

[1] Kan P, Maragkos GA, Srivatsan A, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a multi-center experience of 154 consecutive embolizations[J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 88(2):268-277. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa379.
[2] 孙继伟,李佳欢,王艳荣,等.烧伤康复期患者神经质人格、心理弹性与创伤后应激障碍症状和创伤后成长之间的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2019,33(3):198-202. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.03.008.
[3] 姜素芳,薛乐怡,卢慧娟,等.广州疫情封控区域内高三学生心理弹性及影响因素调查分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(24):3884-3887. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.24.035.
[4] 吴均燕,夏晓伟,刘彤,等.首发精神分裂症患者的心理弹性与认知功能的相关性[J].中华医学杂志,2021,101(37):3006-3011. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210203- 00341.
[5] 郑晓艳,王志霞.胃癌患者自我效能感、心理弹性与术后康复的相关性[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(6):908-912. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2021.06.024.
[6] 陈孝平,汪建平.外科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:56-59.
[7] 陈娟娟,李惠萍,杨娅娟,等.家庭韧性对癌症患者心理韧性的影响:领悟社会支持和生命意义感的链式中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2019,27(6):1205-1209. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.06.026.
[8] 徐霞,袁媛,徐铭,等.军医大学护理双师职业倦怠特点及其与压力、应对方式、社会支持的相关性研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(3):37-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993. 2019.03.009.
[9] 庞晓华,张丽芳.Connor-Davidson心理弹性量表中文版在煤矿工人中应用的信效度分析[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2019,28(7):655-659. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 1674-6554. 2019. 07. 016.
[10] 王一,赵乐妍,陈飞,等.正强化干预对急性心肌梗死患者心理弹性量表评分和健康结局的影响[J].中国心血管病研究,2022,20(1):25-29. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5301.2022. 01.005.
[11] 俞佳,徐留仙,黄晓影,等.授权赋能理论指导下健康教育对有心血管疾病症状的围绝经期女性应对方式心理韧性及睡眠质量的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2022,37(2):333-338. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2022.02.044.
[12] Levey EJ, Rondon MB, Sanchez S, et al. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) among adolescent mothers in Peru[J]. J Child Adolesc Trauma, 2019, 14(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1007/s40653-019-00295-9.
[13] 许娟,李帅妙,裴俊丽,等.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的心理弹性水平及影响因素分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(23):2924-2928. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674- 2907.2019.23.004.
[14] 魏云,朱大乔,李玉梅.成年人慢性病患者心理弹性对健康结局影响的研究进展[J].中国实用护理杂志,2019,35(5):391-395. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088. 2019. 05.015.
[15] 潘捷,吴高远,倪永丰.LVIS密网支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞介入治疗单发颅内破裂小动脉瘤的近期疗效及其并发症发生情况的研究[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2019,32(3):157-162.
[16] 王利,焦晓兰.人性化护理对颅内动脉瘤介入术患者术前生理指标及术后并发症的影响[J].贵州医药,2019,43(12):1991-1992. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.12.073.
[17] 谢凤婷.阶段性心理护理对脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤患者心理弹性及创伤后成长的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2021,40(24):4478-4482. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370- 20200605-01255.
[18] 董倩.基于时效性激励理念的心理护理在急性脑梗死患者心理弹性生存质量的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(18):2525-2527. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2020.18.044.
[19] 李帅妙,杨支兰,许娟.积极心理干预对养老机构老年膝骨关节炎病人心理弹性的影响[J].实用老年医学,2020,34(1):94-97. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2020.01.028.
[20] 寿宇雁,高晓彦,张士莲,等.罗伊适应模式联合结构式团体心理干预对颅颌面创伤病人心理弹性、应对方式及生活质量的影响[J].护理研究,2021,35(16):2983-2986. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.16.033.
[21] 冯驰,郭景鹏,马金菊,等.心理健康教育对颅内动脉瘤术后患者自我感受负担及生活质量的影响[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(5):176-179.
[22] 刘宇,姜桐桐,史铁英.乳腺癌患者心理弹性影响因素及其干预方法的研究进展[J].中国医药导报,2019,16(25):49-52.
[23] 陈欢,沈惠芬.绝经期抑郁症患者社会支持水平与抑郁程度心理弹性及生活质量的相关性分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(17):3909-3912. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.17.003.
[24] 任俊华.先兆早产孕妇心理弹性及其影响因素的路径分析[J].护士进修杂志,2019,34(5):426-429. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019.05.011.
[25] 谷友惠,杨红,陆宇晗,等.癌症患者医学应对方式在心理弹性与死亡焦虑间的中介效应[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(2):189-194.
[26] 刘东玮,周郁秋,孙玉静,等.自我效能对精神分裂症心理弹性的影响:自尊与应对方式的链式中介效应研究[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(5):549-554. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007- 9572.2018.00.301.
[27] 贾蕾,邱娟,何璇,等.老年多发性骨髓瘤患者心理弹性调查及其与应对方式和疾病不确定感的相关性研究[J].老年医学与保健,2021,27(2):257-261. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008- 8296.2021.02.013.
[28] 李承秋,王明达.医学应对方式在宫颈癌术后放疗患者希望水平和心理弹性中的中介效应[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(9):98-99,102. DOI:10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2019. 09.033.
[29] 朱敏,李秀雄,吴定芳,等.自我效能、社会支持及应对方式对大肠侧向发育型肿瘤患者心理弹性影响的路径分析[J].重庆医学,2020,49(13):2131-2134. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1671-8348.2020.13.015.

Analysis of influencing factors of CD-RISC score after interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms

颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后心理弹性量表评分的影响因素分析

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Zhao Zhenzhen. Anesthetic effect of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in interventional treatment for intracranial aneurysms [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(6): 765-768.
[2]	Hu Wei, Liu Liangjin. DCE-MRI combined with DWI in evaluating efficacy of interventional therapy for liver cancer [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(5): 719-724.
[3]	Xu Hongbang, Liu Li, Xiong Jie. Effects of rigid bronchoscopy combined with flexible bronchoscopy on respiratory mechanics and short-term prognosis in patients with malignant central airway stenosis [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(18): 2617-2621.
[4]	Gao Lijing, Guo Haoqi, Xu Xianling. Parental stress and its influencing factors in parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2021, 27(6): 856-860.
[5]	Ma Weiwei. Analysis of humanistic care needs and influencing factors of elderly patients with primary liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2021, 27(6): 901-904.