Clinical effect of ward-clinic-family mode combined with continuous nursing for patients with diabetic retinopathy

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.07.032

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the clinical effect of the ward-clinic-family mode combined with continuous nursing for patients with diabetic retinopathy. Methods　One hundred and twenty patients with diabetes retinopathy admitted to Jinan Second People's Hospital from August 2021 to August 2023 were selected for the prospective study. They were divided into a control group and an observation group by the random number table method, with 60 cases in each group. There were 35 males and 25 females in the control group; they were (55.31±12.13) years old. There were 31 males and 29 females in the observation group; they were (56.18±11.05) years old. The control group took continuous nursing; in addition, the observation group were intervened by the ward-clinic-family mode. The blood glucose control effects, best corrected visual acuities (BCVA), and scores of the Scale of Quality of Life for Diseases with Visual Improvement (SQOL-DVI), Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA), and Exercise of Self-care Agency Scale (ESCA) were compared between the two groups. t and χ² tests were applied. Results　After the intervention, the levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (2h-PG), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group [(8.75±0.86) mmol/L vs. (9.18±0.91) mmol/L, (9.91±1.53) mmol/L vs. (10.64±1.63) mmol/L, and (8.53±0.66)% vs. (8.79±0.71)%], with statistical differences (t=2.660, 2.529, and 2.078; all P<0.05). One week and one month after the intervention, the BCVA of the observation group were lower than those of the control group [(0.36±0.11) LogMAR vs. (0.41±0.12) LogMAR and (0.30±0.10) LogMAR vs. (0.36±0.11) LogMAR], with statistical differences (t=2.379 and 3.126; both P<0.05). After the intervention, the scores of symptom and visual function, physical function, social activity, and mental mind and psychology and total score of SQOL-DVI in the observation group were were higher than those in the control group [(16.28±2.41) vs. (14.93±2.39), (17.96±2.34) vs. (16.90±2.17), (26.76±2.76) vs. (25.21±2.63), and (26.46±3.68) vs. (25.05±3.75), and (87.46±10.68) vs. (81.99±10.46)], with statistical differences (t=3.081, 2.573, 3.149, 2.079, and 2.834; all P<0.05). After the intervention, the scores of diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care and total score of SDSCA in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(4.35±0.40) vs. (4.11±0.39), (4.81±0.67) vs. (4.47±0.70), (2.59±0.40) vs. (2.40±0.35), (4.58±0.36) vs. (4.34±0.36), and (13.74±1.77) vs. (12.82±1.65)], with statistical differences (t=3.328, 2.718, 2.769, 2.609, and 2.945; all P<0.05). The scores self-care skills, responsibility of self-care, self-concept, and health knowledge and total score of ESCA in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [(22.37±3.75) vs. (20.25±3.19), (17.27±3.60) vs. (15.81±3.42), (25.49±5.92) vs. (23.18±5.26), (43.01±3.20) vs. (41.15±3.49), and (108.41±10.64) vs. (102.35±11.13)], with statistical differences (t=3.335, 2.278, 2.259, 3.043, and 3.049; all P<0.05). Conclusion　Ward-clinic-family mode combined with continuous nursing for patients with diabetic retinopathy can effectively strengthen the hypoglycemic effect, and improve their quality of life, self-management ability of patients, and self-care ability.

Key words:

Diabetes mellitus, Ward-clinic-family mode, Retinopathy, Continuous nursing

摘要：

目的　分析病房-门诊-家庭模式干预对糖尿病视网膜病变延续性护理的临床效果。方法　选取2021年8月至2023年8月在济南市第二人民医院治疗的糖尿病视网膜病变患者120例进行前瞻性研究，通过随机数字表法分为对照组及观察组，各60例。对照组男35例、女25例，年龄（55.31±12.13）岁，病程（6.19±0.50）年，采取常规延续性护理；观察组男31例、女29例，年龄（56.18±11.05）岁，病程（6.10±0.46）年，采用常规延续性护理联合病房-门诊-家庭模式。对比两组患者干预前后（出院时、出院后3个月）血糖控制效果、干预1周与干预1个月的最佳矫正视力（BCVA）、干预前后视功能损害眼病患者生存质量量表（SQOL-DVI）、自我管理行为量表（SDSCA）及自我护理能力测定量表（ESCA）。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　干预后，观察组空腹血糖（FBG）［（8.75±0.86）mmol/L］、餐后2 h血糖（2 h-PG）［（9.91±1.53）mmol/L］、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）［（8.53±0.66）%］均低于对照组［（9.18±0.91）mmol/L、（10.64±1.63）mmol/L、（8.79±0.71）%］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.660、2.529、2.078，均P<0.05）；干预后1周、干预后1个月，观察组BCVA水平［（0.36±0.11）LogMAR、（0.30±0.10）LogMAR］均低于对照组［（0.41±0.12）LogMAR、（0.36±0.11）LogMAR］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.379、3.126，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组症状与视功能［（16.28±2.41）分］、身体功能［（17.96±2.34）分］、社会活动［（26.76±2.76）分］、精神与心理［（26.46±3.68）分］及总分［（87.46±10.68）分］均高于对照组［（14.93±2.39）分、（16.90±2.17）分、（25.21±2.63）分、（25.05±3.75）分及（81.99±10.46）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.081、2.573、3.149、2.079、2.834，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组饮食［（4.35±0.40）分］、运动［（4.81±0.67）分］、血糖监测［（2.59±0.40）分］、足部护理［（4.58±0.36）分］及总分［（13.74±1.77）分］均高于对照组［（4.11±0.39）分、（4.47±0.70）分、（2.40±0.35）分、（4.34±0.36）分、（12.82±1.65）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.328、2.718、2.769、2.609、2.945，均P<0.05）。干预后，观察组自护技能［（22.37±3.75）分］、自护责任感［（17.27±3.60）分］、自我概念［（25.49±5.92）分］、健康知识水平［（43.01±3.20）分］及总分［（108.41±10.64）分］均高于对照组［（20.25±3.19）分、（15.81±3.42）分、（23.18±5.26）分、（41.15±3.49）分、（102.35±11.13）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=3.335、2.278、2.259、3.043、3.049，均P<0.05）。结论　病房-门诊-家庭模式干预在糖尿病视网膜病变患者延续性护理中，可强化降糖效果，提升患者生活质量及自我管理能力，优化自我护理能力。

关键词:

糖尿病, 病房-门诊-家庭模式, 视网膜病变, 延续性护理

Yu Na, Yang Nana, Wu Min, Zhang Dimei.

Clinical effect of ward-clinic-family mode combined with continuous nursing for patients with diabetic retinopathy [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(7): 1211-1217.

于娜杨娜娜吴敏张迪梅.

病房-门诊-家庭模式对糖尿病视网膜病变患者延续性护理的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1211-1217.

References

[1] 崔丽梅,陈适,李彬,等. 初诊2型糖尿病患者视网膜病变临床危险因素研究[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(6):665-668.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2020.06.012.
[2] 周燕,何秀娃. 糖尿病患者发生DR的影响因素及康柏西普的治疗效果[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(4):707-710.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.4.29.
[3] 石蕊,肖云芳,王峰,等. 糖尿病合并视网膜分支静脉阻塞患者继发黄斑水肿后视力损伤程度及危险因素[J]. 眼科新进展,2017,37(12):1139-1142.DOI:10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0287.
[4] 蔡鑫,陆宇清,胡晨. 2型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变相关危险因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2018,18(8):1503-1506.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.8.36.
[5] 沈朝兰,黄孔乾,崔凌,等. 增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者视力预后不良的影响因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(4):703-706.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.4.28.
[6] 范春梅,高伟,赵庆霞,等.糖尿病视网膜病变患者就诊延迟原因的描述性质性研究[J].现代临床护理,2023,22(2):33-39.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2023.02.006.
[7] 周静怡,纪小静. 基于新媒体平台的延续护理在控制糖尿病患者心血管疾病危险因素的效果研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(24):3857-3860.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2020.24.041.
[8] 李淑婷,王相宁,吴强. 糖尿病视网膜病变筛查意义及操作指南[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2019,35(2):200-206.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2019.02.019.
[9] 王艳. 糖尿病视网膜病变病人围术期强化心理干预对负性情绪和生存质量的影响[J]. 护理研究,2019,33(4):727-728.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.04.050.
[10] 胡彦秋,胡长娥,常晓芳,等. 延续性护理干预在2型糖尿病视网膜病变中的应用研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2019,35(1):26-32.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088. 2019.01.006.
[11] 杜蓉冰,吕素珍,潘红英. 多学科团队协同延续护理在糖尿病视网膜病变患者中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2020,35(13):86-89.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.13.086.
[12] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(1):4-67. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.01.003.
[13] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会视网膜病变学组. 糖尿病视网膜病变防治专家共识[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(4):241-247.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.04.001.
[14] 胡延秋,杨雪蓝,葛畅. 糖尿病视网膜病变患者血糖管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(2):86-89.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.02.086.
[15] 张玉莲,王丹,惠蓉,等. 护理专业小组模式培训提高临床护士核心能力研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2018,33(19):8-12.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.19.008.
[16] 刘霞,杨贵云,张泓,等. 动机性访谈在老年糖尿病患者饮食治疗中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2017,37(1):202-204.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.01.090.
[17] 李昂,张东辉,井路路,等. 糖尿病共同照护门诊阶段性管理成效及用药分析[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(7):471-475.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.07.007.
[18] 姚鹏翔,许雪亮,江海波,等. SQOL-DV1对甲状腺相关眼病患者生活质量的评估[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2013,13(2):346-349.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.02.38.
[19] 李延飞,陈伟菊,许万萍,等. 2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为量表的改良及其信效度检验[J]. 现代医院,2011,11(3):148-150.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2011.03.074.
[20] 刘延锦,余溯源,郭丽娜,等. 汉化修正版自我护理能力评估量表用于成年人群中的信效度研究[J]. 重庆医学,2018,47(33):4266-4269.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348. 2018.33.017.
[21] 张丽娟,张明月. 曲安奈德辅助23G微创玻璃体切除治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变的手术护理配合[J]. 护士进修杂志,2019,34(3):280-282.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019. 03.024.
[22] 干锦华,刘利,范秋梅,等. 多学科协作模式延续护理在糖尿病性视网膜病变患者中的应用[J]. 重庆医学,2020,49(14):2326-2329.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.14.018.
[23] 杨小玲,袁丽,古艳,等. 糖尿病Triangle分层分级管理流程的构建[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(5):327-333.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.05.006.
[24] 黄一涛,余雪梅,陈春妹,等. 延续性4C护理模式在糖尿病视网膜病患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(22):2863-2866.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019. 22.021.
[25] 陈晓霞,余诗军,陈泽华,等. 延续护理干预在糖尿病视网膜病变患者中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究,2018,15(12):44-46.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2018.12.017.
[26] 晁媛媛,王侠. 延续性护理对糖尿病性视网膜病变患者焦虑的影响分析[J]. 山西医药杂志,2019,48(6):755-757.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2019.06.050.
[27] 庞莎,苗向妮. 延续性护理干预在2型糖尿病视网膜病变中的应用效果分析[J]. 山西医药杂志,2020,49(17):2394-2396.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2020.17.061.
[28] 张少丽,陈亚文,韩萍,等. "入院-出院-家庭随访"一站式健康宣教中心的建立与实践研究[J]. 护士进修杂志,2017,32(15):1359-1362.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2017.15.005.
[29] 赵艳敏,安新荣,刘莉,等. 基于病房-门诊-家庭的全程化护理模式在糖尿病视网膜病变患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(18):52-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256. 2021.18.018.
[30] 付阿丹,王莉. 基于互联网的门诊-病房-家庭三位一体管理模式在2型糖尿病患者中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理,2019,19(z1):75-78.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.z1.030.
[31] 秦小润,汤莉,秦爱华,等. 基于互联网+门诊-病房-家庭三位一体模式在慢性盆腔炎患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(12):53-55.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256. 2020.12.016.