手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果观察

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.01.018

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 87-.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.01.018

手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果观察

苏佳楠苏智勇陈艳

河南中医药大学第五临床医学院郑州人民医院口腔颌面外科，郑州　450000

出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2023-01-27
通讯作者: 苏佳楠，Email：sujianan258@126.com
基金资助:
2019年度河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目（LHGJ20191073）

Clinical efficacy of manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders

Su Jianan, Su Zhiyong, Chen Yan

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou 450000, China

Online:2023-01-01 Published:2023-01-27
Contact: Su Jianan, Email: sujianan258@126.com
Supported by:
Joint Project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Research Plan in 2019 (LHGJ20191073)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析手法复位联合稳定性咬合板在颞下颌关节紊乱病（TMD）患者治疗中的应用价值。方法　选取2019年8月至2022年2月郑州人民医院收治的200例TMD患者进行前瞻性研究，根据患者意愿分为常规组98例和联合组102例。常规组男51例、女47例，年龄（31.74±5.13）岁，实施稳定性咬合板治疗；联合组男64例、女38例，年龄（30.65±5.28）岁，实施手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗。比较两组临床疗效、外观满意度、疼痛程度［视觉模拟评分量表（VAS）评分］、颞下颌关节开口指数（TOI）、颞下颌关节功能量表（Helkimo）评分、静息状态下表面肌电图［左侧颞肌前束（LTA）、右侧颞肌前束（RTA）、左侧咬肌（LMM）、右侧咬肌（RMM）］。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　联合组临床总有效率［96.08%（98/102）］、外观总满意率［93.14%（95/102）］高于常规组［82.65%（81/98）、75.51%（74/98）］（χ²=9.586、P=0.002，χ²=11.857、P=0.001）。治疗后联合组VAS评分［（2.09±0.45）分］、Helkimo评分［（1.27±0.35）分］均低于常规组［（3.26±0.53）分、（2.04±0.33）分］，TOI［（3.87±0.52）cm］高于常规组［（3.35±0.48）cm］（t=16.852、15.944、7.341，均P<0.001）。治疗后联合组LTA［（2.31±0.33）μV］、RTA［（2.18±0.36）μV］、LMM［（1.37±0.24）μV］、RMM肌电值［（1.25±0.25）μV］均低于常规组［（2.87±0.35）μV、（2.79±0.38）μV、（1.68±0.23）μV、（1.74±0.26）μV］（t=6.639、6.646、5.314、7.746，均P<0.001）。结论　手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗TMD患者效果显著，能缓解咀嚼肌痉挛，恢复颞下颌关节功能，减轻患者疼痛和改善张口受限程度，且能提高美容效果。

关键词:

颞下颌关节紊乱病, 稳定性咬合板, 手法复位, 表面肌电图, 美容效果

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the value of manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods　A total of 200 patients with TMD admitted in Zhengzhou People's Hospital from August 2019 to February 2022 were selected as the study objects. According to the patients' intention, they were divided into a conventional group and a combined group. In the conventional group, there were 51 males and 47 females, aged (31.74±5.13) years; in the combined group, there were 64 males and 38 females, aged (30.65±5.28) years. The combined group was treated with manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate, and the conventional group was treated with stable occlusal plate. The clinical efficacy, appearance satisfaction, pain degree [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score], temporomandibular joint opening index (TOI), Temporomandibular Joint Function Scale (Helkimo) score, surface electromyography (EMG) at rest [left anterior temporalis muscle (LTA), right anterior temporalis muscle (RTA), left masseter muscle (LMM), and right masseter muscle (RMM)] were compared between the two groups. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The total clinical effective rate [96.08% (98/102)] and overall appearance satisfaction rate [93.14% (95/102)] of the combined group were higher than those of the conventional group [82.65% (81/98) and 75.51% (74/98)] (χ²=9.586, P=0.002; χ²=11.857, P=0.001). After treatment, the VAS score [(2.09±0.45) points] and Helkimo score [(1.27±0.35) points] in the combined group were lower than those in the conventional group [(3.26±0.53) points and (2.04±0.33) points], and the TOI [(3.87±0.52) cm] was higher than that in the conventional group [(3.35±0.48) cm] (t=16.852, 15.944, and 7.341; all P<0.001). After treatment, the electromyography values of LTA [(2.31±0.33) μV], RTA [(2.18±0.36) μV], LMM [(1.37±0.24) μV], and RMM [(1.25±0.25) μV] in the combined group were lower than those in the conventional group [(2.87±0.35) μV, (2.79±0.38) μV, (1.68±0.23) μV, and (1.74±0.26) μV] (t=6.639, 6.646, 5.314, and 7.746; all P<0.001). Conclusion　Manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate has a significant effect on TMD patients, which can relieve the spasm of masticatory muscles, restore the function of temporomandibular joint, relieve the patients' pain, improve the degree of mouth opening limitation, and improve the cosmetic effect.

Key words:

Temporomandibular disorders, Stable occlusal plate, Manual reduction, Surface electromyography, Cosmetic effect

苏佳楠苏智勇陈艳.

手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(1): 87-.

Su Jianan, Su Zhiyong, Chen Yan.

Clinical efficacy of manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(1): 87-.

参考文献

[1] Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Clin Oral Investig,2021,25(2):441-453. DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w.
[2] 赵晓燕,李英. 咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛和弹响的治疗进展[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志,2019,17(6):362-366. DOI:10.19749/j.cn.cjgd.1672-2973.2019.06.010.
[3] Vrbanović E, Alajbeg IZ. Long-term effectiveness of occlusal splint therapy compared to placebo in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders[J].Acta Stomatol Croat,2019,53(3):195-206. DOI:10.15644/asc53/3/1.
[4] 朱梦然,魏煦,孙卫斌,等. 手法复位结合稳定型咬合板治疗急性颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学,2021,41(11):1000-1003,1051. DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.11.009.
[5] Durham J. Summary of Royal College of Surgeons' (England) clinical guidelines on management of temporomandibular disorders in primary care[J].Br Dent J,2015,218(6):355-356. DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.194.
[6] 吴文瑶,张谨,郑华.世界医学协会«赫尔辛基宣言»:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(2):92-95. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101658-20191025- 1910-149.
[7] 李焱,宁伟民,杨刚. 定型牙合垫联合手法治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(14):2162-2164. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021. 14.029.
[8] Shousha T, Alayat M, Moustafa I. Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized-controlled study[J].PLoS One,2021,16(10):e0258063. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0258063.
[9] 张馨匀,李婵,李洪发. 成人颞下颌关节骨关节病骨性改变与Helkimo指数的关系[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2018,16(1):64-68. DOI:10.19438/j.cjoms.2018.01.014.
[10] 张秦兰蕙,刘方,吴利娜,等. 骨性安氏Ⅲ类错伴偏颌及与颞下颌关节紊乱病的关联研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治,2022,30(1):63-67. DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456. 2022.01.011.
[11] 白露,吴琳. 稳定型咬合板配合咬合重建序列治疗对咀嚼肌疼痛的疗效评价[C]//中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员会第十二次全国口腔修复学学术会议论文集, 2018:181.
[12] 韩佩洁,郭凯锋,卢钜勇,等. 稳定型咬合板联合体外冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果[J]. 河南医学研究,2021,30(14):2537-2539. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004- 437X.2021.14.012.
[13] 赵迎帆,张丹,侯志明. 稳定型咬合板治疗安氏Ⅱ类2分类错牙合伴颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效[J]. 中国医科大学学报,2021,50(7):612-615. DOI:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646. 2021.07.008.
[14] 翟梅,秦爱萍,郭燕,等. 两种不同咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床效果[J]. 实用临床医学,2021,22(1):35-38. DOI:10.13764/j.cnki.lcsy.2021.01.012.
[15] 杨梦楠. 稳定型咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱患者的效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2021,33(9):128-130. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2021.09.051.
[16] 潘璐璐,胡锦荣,叶鹏程. 稳定型牙合垫联合手法治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱病患者MFIQ评分、最大张口度及VAS评分的影响[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志,2020,30(11):914-917. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4561.2020.11.014.
[17] 叶海程,张文扬. 基于动能系统整体康复的手法治疗对改善颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床疗效[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(9):1131-1133. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242. 2021.09.014.
[18] Sójka A, Huber J, Hędzelek W, et al. Relations between the results of complex clinical and neurophysiological examinations in patients with temporomandibular disorders symptoms[J]. Cranio,2018,36(1):44-52. DOI:10.1080/08869634.2017.1290907.
[19] 胡健来.颞下颌关节盘前移位患者最大紧咬时咀嚼肌肌电特征及其对关节盘前移位的辅助诊断[D].杭州:浙江大学,2019:22-25.
[20] 雷明辉,熊璟,姬小婷,等. 不同咬合板接触点对颞下颌关节紊乱病咀嚼肌肌电的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2020,20(18):3506-3509. DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2020. 18.024.
[21] 李飞,任月,王瑞,等. 手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效及表面肌电图变化[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2019,40(7):676-678. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2019.07.018.

手法复位联合稳定性咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果观察

Clinical efficacy of manual reduction combined with stable occlusal plate in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics