磁共振高分辨血管壁成像在诊断缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉硬化疾病中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.11.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　探究磁共振高分辨血管壁成像（HR-VWI）在诊断缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉硬化疾病中的应用。方法　选取2019年1月至2021年2月聊城市第三人民医院收治的80例颅内动脉硬化缺血性脑卒中患者，根据病理情况分为动脉-动脉栓塞组（同一血管支配区存在单发皮层梗死或多发梗死）、穿支动脉受累组（豆纹动脉和脑桥旁支动脉供血区病变）。动脉-动脉栓塞组43例，其中男24例，女19例，年龄57～75岁；穿支动脉受累组37例，其中男22例，女15例，年龄56～76岁。两组患者均行数字减影血管造影（DSA）、HR-VWI检查，统计HR-VWI颅内动脉硬化检出情况，对比两组颅内动脉改变情况、颅内动脉硬化斑块形态相关指标，采用SPSS 23.0分析数据，计量资料比较采用t检验，计数资料采用χ²检验，一致性采用Kappa指数检验，P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果　HR-VWI、DSA检查颅内动脉硬化狭窄程度准确度分别为93.75%（75/80）、100.00%（80/80），差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。HR-VWI检查颅内动脉硬化诊断狭窄程度Kappa指数（0.911）较高（P<0.05）。经HR-VWI检查，动脉-动脉栓塞组血管壁厚度为（0.42±0.08）mm、管腔内径为（2.28±0.64）mm、管腔面积为（4.51±1.28）mm²，穿支动脉受累组分别为（0.40±0.16）mm、（2.25±0.61）mm、（4.45±1.12）mm²，两组比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。两组斑块位置、重构形式、重构指数、强化率对比，差异均有统计学意义（t=51.098、23.978、2.295、17.890，均P<0.05）。结论　HR-VWI在缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉硬化疾病中的诊断价值较高，可有效诊断颅内动脉管壁结构及斑块形态相关信息，对临床诊治及病情评估具有积极意义。

关键词: 磁共振高分辨血管壁成像, 颅内动脉硬化, 缺血性脑卒中, 斑块

Abstract: Objective　To explore the application of magnetic resonance high-resolution vascular wall imaging (HR-VWI) in the diagnosis of intracranial arteriosclerosis in patients with ischemic stroke. Methods　Eighty patients with intracranial arteriosclerosis ischemic stroke treated in Liaocheng Third People's Hospital from January 2019 to February 2021 were divided into an artery-artery embolization group (single cortical infarction or multiple infarction in the same vascular innervation area) and a perforator artery involvement group (lesions in the blood supply area of lenticular artery and parapontine artery). There were 43 cases in the artery-artery embolization group, including 24 males and 19 females, and they were 57-75 years old. There were 37 cases in the perforator artery involvement group, including 22 males and 15 females, and they were 56-76 years old. All the patients were examined by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and HR-VWI. The detection of intracranial arteriosclerosis by HR-VWI was counted. The changes of intracranial arteries and the related indicators of intracranial arteriosclerosis plaque morphology were compared between the two groups. SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data. The measurement data were compared between these two groups by t test, and the enumeration data by χ² test. The coincidence was tested by the Kappa index. If P<0.05, there was a statistical difference. Results　There was no statistical difference in the accuracy of intracranial arteriosclerosis stenosis between HR-VWI and DSA [93.75% (75/80) vs. 100.00% (80/80), P>0.05]. The Kappa index (0.911) of intracranial arteriosclerosis diagnosed by HR-VWI was higher (P<0.05). The vessel wall thickness, lumen diameter, and lumen area by HR-VWI were (0.42±0.08) mm, (2.28±0.64) mm, and (4.51±1.28) mm² in the artery-artery embolization group, and were (0.40±0.16) mm, (2.25±0.61) mm, and (4.45±1.12) mm² in the perforator artery involvement group, with no statistical differences between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were statistical differences in the plaque location, remodeling form, remodeling index, and enhancement rate between the two groups (t=51.098, 23.978, 2.295, and 17.890; all P<0.05). Conclusions　HR-VWI has high value in the diagnosis of intracranial arteriosclerosis in patients with ischemic stroke. It can effectively diagnose intracranial artery wall structure and get the relevant information of plaque morphology, and has positive significance for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and condition evaluation.

Key words: Magnetic resonance high resolution vascular wall imaging, Intracranial arteriosclerosis, Ischemic stroke, Plaque

肖太星, 张敏, 唐雪珂, 冯博. 磁共振高分辨血管壁成像在诊断缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉硬化疾病中的应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(11): 1508-1512.

Xiao Taixing, Zhang Min, Tang Xueke, Feng Bo. High resolution magnetic resonance angiography in diagnosis of intracranial arteriosclerosis in patients with ischemic stroke[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(11): 1508-1512.

参考文献

[1] 王禹,张建刚,李振华,等.动脉粥样硬化型急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗研究进展[J].中华神经医学杂志,2020,19(7):729-734.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20200509-00349.

[2] 周慧,王效春.颅内动脉粥样硬化影像评估新进展[J].磁共振成像,2022,13(2):123-126.DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.030.

[3] Prasetya H,Ramos LA,Epema T,et al.Quantitative assessment of brain tissue reperfusion on digital subtraction angiograms of acute ischemic stroke patients[J].Int J Stroke,2021,16(2):207-216.DOI:10.1177/1747493020909632.

[4] 陈林锋,王理,汪荣,等.高分辨磁共振成像在缺血性脑卒中患者大脑中动脉狭窄重塑模式中的应用[J].浙江医学,2021,43(18):2001-2003,2008.DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2021.43.18.2021-225.

[5] 李文君,刘翠翠,刘俊艳.高分辨率磁共振管壁成像对缺血性卒中病因的精准诊断价值[J].中国卒中杂志,2021,16(1):39-44.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.01.007.

[6] 魏梦娇.高分辨磁共振血管壁成像技术颈动脉粥样硬化应用[J].放射学实践,2021,36(2):275-278.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2021.02.025.

[7] 吴静静,贾琳,王云玲,等.磁共振血管壁成像对症状性大脑中动脉粥样硬化斑块的定量评估[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(11):2152-2155.DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2020.11.004.

[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.

[9] 孙萍,聂斌,潘岳松,等.颅内动脉粥样硬化负荷对缺血性卒中预后的影响[J].中国卒中杂志,2020,15(4):394-400.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2020.04.012.

[10] 刘伟,黄文琪,马培英,等.缺血性脑卒中伴脑血管动脉粥样硬化狭窄的影响因素分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2020,45(9):1184-1186.DOI:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200. 2020. 09.011.

[11] 张君,马林.重视高分辨率MRI新技术对颅内血管壁病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2020,54(4):269-272.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200207-00109.

[12] 陈士跃,田霞,王振,等.3D IVWI与DSA评价颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄对比研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2021,27(4):275-279.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2021.04.001.

[13] 张宪,李彭,赵晖,等.数字减影血管造影对脑梗死患者颈部血管的诊断价值研究[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(2):75-77.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2020.02.020.

[14] 杨国辉,梁玉泉,陈燕,等.高分辨血管壁MRI在颅内动脉疾病中的诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2021,31(3):379-381,386.

[15] Kang HG,Lee CH,Shin BS,et al.Characteristics of symptomatic basilar artery stenosis using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic stroke patients[J].J Atheroscler Thromb,2021,28(10):1063-1070.DOI:10.5551/jat.58214.

[16] 任凯旋,蒋华赟,王天乐,等.高分辨力MR血管壁成像在急性缺血性脑卒中临床决策中的应用进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2022,45(1):56-60.DOI:10.19300/j.2022.Z19010.

[17] 王红茹,高阳,吴琼.高分辨率磁共振血管壁成像在颅内动脉粥样硬化斑块上的研究进展[J].磁共振成像,2021,12(9):95-97,102.DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.09.024.

[18] 柏夏薇,吴昆华,孟迪.高分辨磁共振血管壁成像在颅内动脉夹层中的研究进展[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2020,43(5):555-559.DOI:10.19300/j.2020.Z17736.

[19] Ran Y,Wang Y,Zhu M,et al.Higher plaque burden of middle cerebral artery is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke:a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study[J].Stroke,2020,51(2):659-662.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA. 119.028405.

[20] 刘楠,李斌,冯煜森,等.高分辨率磁共振血管壁成像评价颅内动脉瘤稳定性的作用[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2021,24(12):1020-1025.DOI:10.12083/SYSJ.2021.13.020.

[21] 马泽兰,霍梦娟,刘国清.高分辨MR血管壁成像在颅内动脉夹层中的应用进展[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2021,38(6):567-569.DOI:10.19845/j.cnki.zfysjjbzz.2021.0153.

[22] 韩帅,王心雨,张超,等.高分辨率磁共振血管壁成像在评价中枢神经系统血管炎活动性的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2021,40(3):416-420.DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2021. 03.003.

[23] 顾军,王觅,张丹凤,等.大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者高分辨率磁共振成像血管壁特征与缺血性卒中风险[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2021,29(6):401-406.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4165.2021.06.001.

[24] 梁汉祥,李新春.高分辨磁共振成像检测轻度大脑中动脉粥样斑块情况对梗死类型的评估价值[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2020,18(21):3672-3675.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2020.21.042.

[25] 张伊,付其昌,管生,等.高分辨率MR血管壁成像测量壁强化指数评估颅内动脉瘤不稳定性[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2021,18(5):285-289.DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1672-8475. 2021. 05.007.

[26] 林威龙,贾琳,王云玲,等.高分辨率磁共振血管壁成像对大脑中动脉粥样硬化斑块与豆纹动脉血管特征分析的应用研究[J].磁共振成像,2020,11(2):109-112.DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.02.007.

[27] 刘宇博,冯平勇,杨海骁,等.高分辨磁共振血管壁成像在颅内动脉粥样硬化性缺血性卒中的研究进展[J].临床荟萃,2021,36(12):1148-1152.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004- 583X. 2021.12.020.

[28] 张桂荣,张博,丁墩,等.高分辨MR血管壁成像在颈内动脉闭塞中的应用价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2021,37(11):1775-1779.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2021.11.008.

[29] 谢伊代·苏力坦,贾琳,王云玲.高分辨磁共振血管壁成像对腔隙性脑梗人群豆纹动脉血管形态特征分析[J].中国医学装备,2021,18(1):46-49.DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672- 8270. 2021.01.012.

[30] 许冬华,闵志刚,施俊峰,等.不同机制的症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化患者H RMRI斑块特征分析[J].卒中与神经疾病,2020,27(2):161-165.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478. 2020.02.004.

[31] 袁伟壮,徐蔚海.高分辨磁共振技术在颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病的临床应用[J].华西医学,2021,36(6):707-713.DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.202105023.

[32] 陈思静,宋建勋,林国辉,等.高分辨率血管壁成像评估颅内动脉瘤破裂风险[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2020,28(7):547-551.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4165.2020.07.012.