广州社区高血压控制满意患者颈动脉斑块转归分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.10.001

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 1333-1337.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.10.001

• 科研课题专栏 • 下一篇

广州社区高血压控制满意患者颈动脉斑块转归分析

杨东恒¹ 朱启科¹ 叶博文¹ 邓海雅¹ 符姝姝¹ 莫明树² 徐评议² 田作军²

¹广州医科大学第一临床学院，广州　510160； ²广州医科大学附属第一医院神经内科，广州　510120

收稿日期:2021-12-13 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-16
通讯作者: 田作军，Email：tianzuojun9@163.com
基金资助:
广东省科技厅社会发展项目（2013B021800282，2014A020212350）；

广州市重点学科财政补助项目（0332100000093）

Outcome analysis of carotid plaque in patients with satisfactory hypertension control in Guangzhou communities

Yang Dongheng¹, Zhu Qike¹, Ye Bowen¹, Deng Haiya¹, Fu Shushu¹, Mo Mingshu², Xu Pingyi², Tian Zuojun²

¹The First Clinical College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510160, China;
²Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China

Received:2021-12-13 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-16
Contact: Tian Zuojun, Email: tianzuojun9@163.com
Supported by:
Social Development Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2013B021800282, 2014A020212350);

Financial Subsidy Project for Key Disciplines in Guangzhou (0332100000093)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　探讨广州社区高血压控制满意患者颈动脉斑块的临床转归。方法　连续收集2016年1月至2019年12月在广州医科大学附属第一医院神经内科在半年至1年内两次住院且均作颈动脉超声检测的广州社区患者326例，其中男166例、女160例，年龄（71.17±0.60）岁。分为非高血压（56例）、高血压控制满意（195例）和高血压控制不满意（75例）3组，比较颈动脉斑块的临床转归（△Crouse评分）；再将资料分为70岁以下和70岁及以上两个层次进一步分析3组间斑块的转归；最后，将高血压患者再分为高血压两次控制满意（160例）、一次控制满意（35例）和两次控制均不满意（75例）3个亚组，分析斑块的转归情况。计量资料采用单因素ANOVA或Kruskal-Wallis法检验，计数资料采用χ²检验。结果　高血压控制满意组和非高血压组间△Crouse评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；但高血压控制不满意组与高血压控制满意组、非高血压组之间△Crouse评分差异均有统计学意义［0.400（0.000，1.900）分比0.000（-0.200，0.700）分比0.000（-0.200，0.200）分］（均P<0.05）。在70岁以下和70岁及以上患者中高血压控制满意患者与非高血压患者间△Crouse评分差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。3个高血压亚组中，高血压两次控制满意组与两次控制不满意组间△Crouse评分差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），其他分组间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论　对所有年龄的高血压患者，血压控制满意后，颈动脉斑块进展情况与非高血压患者无明显差别；但血压控制不满意患者颈动脉斑块的进展明显增快。

关键词: 高血压, 颈动脉斑块, 颈动脉超声, 社区研究

Abstract: Objective　To investigate the clinical outcome of carotid plaque in patients with satisfactory hypertension control in Guangzhou communities. Methods　From January 2016 to December 2019, 326 patients in Guangzhou communities were continuously recruited in the study, they were hospitalized in Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and also underwent carotid ultrasonography twice within half a year to one year. There were 166 males and 160 females, aged (71.17±0.60) years. The patients were divided into a non-hypertension group (NH group, 56 cases), a satisfactory hypertension control group (SH group, 195 cases), and an unsatisfactory hypertension control group (USH group, 75 cases). The clinical outcomes of carotid plaque (△Crouse score) of the three groups were compared. Then, a stratified analysis of △Crouse score was performed between younger than and equal to or older than 70 years old among the above three groups. Finally, the hypertensive patients were further subdivided into three subgroups of hypertension with satisfactory control twice (160 cases), satisfactory control once (35 cases), and unsatisfactory control twice (75 cases) to analyze the △Crouse score. The measurement data were tested by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis method, and the count data were tested by χ² test. Results　There was no statistically significant difference in the △Crouse score between the SH group and the NH group (P>0.05); there was a statistically significant difference in the △Crouse score between the USH group and the SH group or the NH group [0.400 (0.000, 1.900 ) points vs. 0.000 (-0.200, 0.700) points vs. 0.000 (-0.200, 0.200) points] (both P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the △Crouse score between the SH group and the NH group in patients younger than and equal to or older than 70 years old (both P>0.05). Among the three hypertensive subgroups, there was statistically significant difference in the △Crouse score between the two subgroups with and without satisfactory hypertension control twice (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between other subgroups (P>0.05). Conclusions　For hypertensive patients of all ages, after satisfactory hypertension control, the progression of carotid plaque is not significantly different from that of non-hypertensive patients. However, it is significantly accelerated in patients with unsatisfactory hypertension control.

Key words: Hypertension, Carotid plaque, Carotid ultrasonography, Community research

杨东恒, 朱启科, 叶博文, 邓海雅, 符姝姝, 莫明树, 徐评议, 田作军. 广州社区高血压控制满意患者颈动脉斑块转归分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(10): 1333-1337.

Yang Dongheng, Zhu Qike, Ye Bowen, Deng Haiya, Fu Shushu, Mo Mingshu, Xu Pingyi, Tian Zuojun. Outcome analysis of carotid plaque in patients with satisfactory hypertension control in Guangzhou communities[J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2022, 28(10): 1333-1337.

参考文献

[1] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南2010[J].中华高血压杂志,2011,19(8):前插1,701-743.

[2] 马一涵,李兴雨,韩旭,等.动脉硬化与原发性高血压对心脑血管疾病发病的影响及联合作用:基于8年的随访研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(23):2907-2913.

[3] 龙自华.动脉粥样硬化性严重颈动脉狭窄患者的脑血管疾病危险因素与钙化斑块特征的相关性分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(13):1902-1904. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2020.13.023.

[4] Lu M, Wu L, Shi P, et al. Hypertension and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a suburban general population in China[J]. J Hypertens, 2004, 22(9):1699-1706. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200409000-00013.

[5] 魏琼娥,徐蕊,丁雅昕,等.颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者应用B超诊断的准确率及临床研究[J].影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(18):199-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807. 2021.18.097.

[6] Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004-2006). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2007, 23(1):75-80. DOI: 10.1159/000097034.

[7] 郭晓斌,王鹏,陶立元,等.颈动脉粥样斑块形成的影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(17):2043-2047.

[8] 田作军,刘磊,董亚贤,等.影响颈动脉斑块形成因素的临床分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2008,7(11):1168-1173. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-8925.2008.11.022.

[9] Rognoni A, Cavallino C, Veia A, et al. Pathophysiology of atherosclerotic plaque development[J]. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem, 2015, 13(1):10-13. DOI: 10.2174/1871525713666141218163425.

[10] Hurtubise J, McLellan K, Durr K, et al. The different facets of dyslipidemia and hypertension in atherosclerosis[J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2016, 18(12):82. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-016-0632-z.

[11] Sterpetti AV. Inflammatory cytokines and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Therapeutic implications[J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2020, 22(12):75. DOI: 10.1007/s11883- 020-00891-3.

[12] 武爱萍,马一涵,李兴雨,等.长时血压变异性对动脉硬化的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(2):148-153.

[13] Liberale L, Camici GG. The role of vascular aging in atherosclerotic plaque development and vulnerability[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2019, 25(29):3098-3111. DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190830175424.

[14] 王喆,池洪杰,王洪江,等.老年原发性高血压患者血压变异性与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性[J].中国医刊,2021,56(7):759-761. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2021.07.019.

广州社区高血压控制满意患者颈动脉斑块转归分析

Outcome analysis of carotid plaque in patients with satisfactory hypertension control in Guangzhou communities

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谭玉, 张照婷, 刘建华, 冯寿琴, 李伟, 陈皆春. 急性脑梗死患者心脏功能和颅内外动脉血流动力学的临床研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(9): 1296-1301.
[2]	赵洋, 周洁, 耿朝辉. 高血压患者认知衰弱评估及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(6): 748-752.
[3]	刘振, 孙经武, 张宁, 刘婧玚, 石新烨, 董文敬. 尿酸与心血管疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(6): 884-888.
[4]	于建辉, 马静, 毛丽, 杨虹. 医疗大数据背景下构建老年“心衰-高血压”共病风险评估模型的可行性分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 446-449.
[5]	王永胜, 王志强, 李书清, 周世聪, 王宗宝. 3D打印导板引导下快速锥颅软通道穿刺治疗中少量基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 540-544.
[6]	辜思存, 刘琴. 体检人群的饮食行为与BMI及糖尿病和高血压的相关性研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 572-576.
[7]	刘振, 孙经武, 张宁, 石新烨, 刘婧玚. RBP4与心血管疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 586-589.
[8]	程金凤, 王倩倩, 甄萌萌, 程艳丽. 生物钟基因Cry1与动脉粥样硬化相关性研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(10): 1343-1346.
[9]	李八统, 文莺颖, 杨年华, 于剑兰. 基于“五脏同调”理论探讨中医食疗调理痰湿体质高血压的作用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(10): 1426-1430.
[10]	墨妍, 刘丹, 李动. 颈动脉超声联合心脏彩色超声检查对冠心病的筛查价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(1): 49-52.
[11]	倪程程. 预见性护理用于高血压脑出血患者的效果分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2021, 27(6): 929-931.