国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (22): 3793-3798.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250208-22019

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

广州市海珠区20212024年流感病毒核酸检测结果分析

陈秋杰1  白珊珊1  谭泳晖1  蔡振练1  吴晓宾2   

  1. 1广州市海珠区疾病预防控制中心,广州 510288;2广东省中医院检验科,广州 510030
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-08 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 蔡振练,Email:337064525@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2023A1515220044);广州市卫生健康科技一般引导项目(2024A010089);海珠区科技计划(海科工商信计2022-27)

Analysis of influenza surveillance results in Haizhu district of Guangzhou from 2021 to 2024

Chen Qiujie1, Bai Shanshan1, Tan Yonghui1, Cai Zhenlian1, Wu Xiaobin2   

  1. 1 Haizhu District  Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510288, China; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510030, China

  • Received:2025-02-08 Online:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-19
  • Contact: Cai Zhenlian, Email: 337064525@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund (2023A1515220044), Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project (2024A010089); Science and Technology Project at Haizhu District (HAIKEGONGSHANGXINJI 2022-27)

摘要: 目的 分析2021—2024年海珠区流感病毒流行规律和病原学特征,为制定流感疫情防控措施提供科学依据和技术支撑。方法 对2021年3月至2024年12月送检海珠区疾病预防控制中心的5 120份流感样病例咽拭子进行核酸检测。其中,男性样本检测数为2 698份,女性样本检测数为2 422份,年龄1 d~98岁。分析样本中甲/乙型流感病毒的检出情况,并对比不同型别流感病毒的人群和季节分布特征。统计学方法采用χ2检验多重比较Bonferroni法。结果 共检测咽拭子样本5 120份,检出流感病毒阳性样本2 578份,阳性检出率为50.34%。其中,甲型流感的阳性检出率为68.11%(1 756/2 578),乙型流感的阳性检出率为31.89%(822/2 578)。以甲型流感病毒感染为主,尤其是2023年,甲型流感病毒阳性检出率高达75.12%。冬季阳性检出率[63.86%(569/891)]、春季阳性检出率[62.17%(1 047/1 684)]均高于夏、秋两季,不同季节流感病毒检测阳性率差异有统计学意义(χ2=1 313.806,P<0.001)。对不同季节的流感病毒亚型检测结果进行分析,春季甲型(H1N1)亚型流感病毒占比最高(77.9%),冬季甲型(H3N2)亚型病毒检出率较高(37.65%),秋季则出现了甲型(H3N2)亚型和乙型(Victoria)亚型双优势的流行趋势,差异有统计学意义(χ2=490.000,P<0.001)。检测样本中,男、女阳性检出率分别为50.22%(1 355/2 698)和50.50%(1 223/2 422)。对其中的939份样本进行流感病毒亚型分型检测,结果显示:在所有分型中,男性的流感亚型检出率均高于女性,差异有统计学意义(χ2=214.892,P<0.001)。流感病毒核酸阳性检出率最高是5~<15岁年龄组,检出率为73.55%(2 077/2 824),而≥60岁年龄组的老年人检出率最低,仅为8.14%(31/381);各年龄段甲型流感检出率均高于乙型流感,不同年龄组流感病毒阳性检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.095,P=0.017)。学生群体的流感病毒阳性检出率高于其他人群,不同职业检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2=2 157.191,P<0.001)。结论 广州市海珠区2021—2024年流感优势株呈季节性交替变换流行,甲型流感流行强度总体高于乙型流感,在5~<15岁儿童和中小学生群体中检出率较高。应持续做好学校流感病原学监测,通过疫苗接种、健康科普等防控措施,加强对托幼机构、中小学校流感疫情的监测与防控。

关键词: 流行性感冒, 流感病毒, 核酸检测

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the epidemic patterns and pathogenic characteristics of influenza viruses in Haizhu District from 2021 to 2024, and to provide scientific basis and technical support for formulating influenza prevention and control measures. Methods From March 2021 to December 2024, 5 120 throat swab samples from influenza-like cases were sent for nucleic acid testing in the Huizhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The number of male samples tested was 2 698, and the number of female samples tested was 2 422. The age ranged from 1 day to 98 years old. The detection rates of influenza A/B viruses in the samples were analysed, and the population and seasonal distribution characteristics of different types of influenza viruses were compared. The statistical methodology employed the χ2 test and the Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons. Results A total of 5 120 throat swab samples were tested, and 2 578 samples were found to be positive for the influenza virus. The positive detection rate was 50.34%. Among them, the positive detection rate of influenza A was 68.11% (1 756/2 578), and the positive detection rate of influenza B was 31.89% (822/2 578). The predominant infection was caused by the influenza A virus, especially in 2023, when the positive detection rate of the influenza A virus reached as high as 75.12%. The positive detection rates in winter [63.86% (569/891)] and in spring [62.17% (1 047/1 684)] were both higher than those in summer and autumn. There was a statistically significant difference in the positive detection rate of influenza viruses between different seasons (χ2=1 313.806, P<0.001). The detection results of different seasonal influenza virus subtypes were analyzed. The proportion of type A (H1N1) influenza virus was the highest in spring (77.9%), while the detection rate of type A (H3N2) virus was higher in winter (37.65%). In autumn, there was a dual dominant trend of type A (H3N2) and type B (Victoria) subtypes, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=490.000, P<0.001). The positive detection rates for males and females in the test samples were 50.22% (1,355/2,698) and 50.50% (1,223/2,422), respectively. For 939 of the samples, subtype detection of the influenza virus was conducted. The results showed that among all the subtypes, the detection rate of influenza subtypes in males was higher than that in females, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=214.892, P<0.001). The highest positive detection rate of influenza virus nucleic acid was observed in the age group of 5 to <15 years old, with a detection rate of 73.55% (2 077/2 824), while the detection rate for the elderly in the ≥60-year-old age group was the lowest, only 8.14% (31/381). The detection rates of influenza A in all age groups were higher than those of influenza B. There was a statistically significant difference in the positive detection rate of influenza viruses between different age groups (χ2=12.095, P=0.017). The positive detection rate of influenza virus of the student group was higher than those of other groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the detection rate between different occupations (χ2=2 157.191, P<0.001). Conclusions At the Haizhu District of Guangzhou City, the dominant influenza strains showed seasonal alternation in their prevalence from 2021 to 2024. The prevalence of type A influenza was generally higher than that of type B influenza. The detection rate was higher among children aged 5 to <15 years old and students. Continuous influenza pathogen monitoring should be carried out in schools. Through vaccination and health education measures, the monitoring and prevention of influenza outbreaks in kindergartens and primary and secondary schools should be strengthened.

Key words: Influenza, Influenza virus, Nucleic acid detection