外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型及影响因素的潜在剖面分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250219-16033

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (16): 2802-2807.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20250219-16033

外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型及影响因素的潜在剖面分析

代慧滕思思李实英胡飘飘

中南大学湘雅医学院附属儿童医院（湖南省儿童医院）手术室，长沙 410007

收稿日期:2025-02-19 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-08-28
通讯作者: 滕思思，Email：332184221@qq.com
基金资助:
湖南省卫生健康委科研课题（202206023856）

Self-efficacy classification of stress injury management in surgical nurses and potential profile analysis of influencing factors

Dai Hui, Teng Sisi, Li Shiying, Hu Piaopiao

Operation Room, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (Hunan Children's Hospital), Changsha 410007, China

Received:2025-02-19 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-28
Contact: Teng Sisi, Email: 332184221@qq.com
Supported by:
Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (202206023856)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　通过潜在剖面分析对外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型进行类别分析，并探讨其影响因素。方法　本研究为横断面研究，采用便利抽样法，选取2024年3月至2024年10月中南大学湘雅医学院附属儿童医院的246名外科护士作为研究对象。其中，男14名（5.7%），女232名（94.3%）；18～25岁95名（38.6%），>25～36岁85名（34.6%），≥36岁66名（26.8%）。使用一般资料调查表和中文版护士压力性损伤管理自我效能量表进行调查。统计学方法采用潜在剖面分析（Mplus 7.0）、方差分析、χ²检验和logistic回归分析。结果　外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能量表总得分为（31.16±6.18）分。潜在剖面分析结果显示，外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分为3个分型：低等自我效能组（45.1%，111/246）、中等自我效能组（38.2%，94/246）和高等自我效能组（16.7%，41/246）。Logistic回归分析结果显示，职称（OR=9.122，95%CI 2.050～40.633，P=0.003）、工作年限（OR=2.247，95%CI 1.481～3.434，P<0.001）、是否为压损小组成员（OR=1.688，95%CI 1.393～2.044，P<0.001）、参加压力性损伤培训次数（OR=4.713，95%CI 1.874～11.872，P=0.001）和获取压损相关知识方式（OR=4.435，95%CI 1.673～11.749，P=0.003）是外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型的影响因素。结论　外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型存在异质性，职称、工作年限、是否为压损小组成员、参加压力性损伤培训次数、获取压损相关知识方式均是其影响因素。

关键词:

自我效能, 外科护士, 压力性损伤, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the self-efficacy classification of stress injury management in surgical nurses by the potential profile analysis, and to explore its influencing factors. Methods　A total of 246 surgical nurses from the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University were selected for this cross-sectional study from March 2024 to October 2024 by the convenience sampling method. Among them, there were 14 males (5.7%) and 232 females (94.3%); there were 95 cases (38.6%) who were 18 to 25 old, 85 cases (34.6%) who were >25 to 36 old, and 66 cases (26.8%) who were ≥36 years old. The General Data Questionnaire and Chinese version of Nurses' Stress Injury Management Self-efficacy Scale were used to investigate them. The statistical methods included potential profile analysis (Mplus 7.0), analysis of variance, χ² test, and logistic regression analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results　The total score of the Nurses' Stress Injury Management Self-efficacy Scale was 31.16±6.18. The results of potential profile analysis showed that the self-efficacy of the surgical nurses in stress injury management was divided into three types: a low self-efficacy group (45.1%, 111/246), a medium self-efficacy group (38.2%, 94/246), and a high self-efficacy group (16.7%, 41/246). The logistic regression analysis showed that professional title (OR=9.122, 95%CI 2.050-40.633, P=0.003), years of work (OR=2.247, 95%CI 1.4813.434, P<0.001), whether they were members of the stress injury group (OR=1.688, 95%CI 1.393-2.044, P<0.001), and the number of stress injury training (OR=4.713, 95%CI 1.874-11.872, P=0.001), and the way of acquiring knowledge about stress injury (OR=4.435, 95%CI 1.673-11.749, P=0.003) were the influential factors for the self-efficacy classification of the nurses' stress injury management. Conclusions　There is heterogeneity in the self-efficacy classification of nurses' stress injury management in operating room. Their professional title, years of working in operating room, whether they are members of a stress injury team, number of stress injury training, and way of acquiring knowledge related to stress injury are the influencing factors.

Key words:

Self-efficacy, Surgical nurses, Stress injury, Potential profile analysis

代慧滕思思李实英胡飘飘.

外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型及影响因素的潜在剖面分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(16): 2802-2807.

Dai Hui, Teng Sisi, Li Shiying, Hu Piaopiao.

Self-efficacy classification of stress injury management in surgical nurses and potential profile analysis of influencing factors [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(16): 2802-2807.

参考文献

[1] 陈思齐, 刘宁, 侯晓敏, 等. 机器人胃癌手术围术期加速康复外科护理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 31-36. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.08.031.
[2] Lopez MG, Shotwell MS, Hennessy C, et al. Intraoperative oxygen treatment, oxidative stress, and organ injury following cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(10): 1106-1116. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2906.
[3] Murabito P, Astuto M, Sanfilippo F, et al. Proactive management of intraoperative hypotension reduces biomarkers of organ injury and oxidative stress during elective non-cardiac surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(2): 392. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020392.
[4] Khan AF, MacDonald MK, Streutker C, et al. Tissue stress from laparoscopic grasper use and bowel injury in humans: establishing intraoperative force boundaries[J]. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol, 2021, 3(1): e000084. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000084.
[5] 刘佳, 黎莉佳. 某儿童医院手术部护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2024, 31(26): 141-144. DOI: 10.19792/i.cnki.1006-6411.2024.26.036.
[6] 倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4): 378-380. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.04.037.
[7] Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, et al. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2019, 28(17/18): 3177-3188. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14875.
[8] 侯梦晓, 王飞杰, 黄丽洁, 等. 护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(9): 840-843. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.09.015.
[9] 王济川, 王小倩. 应用统计学丛书结构方程模型: Mplus与应用(英文版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012.
[10] 蒋维连, 韦群梅, 王秀梅, 等. 手术室护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 上海护理, 2023, 23(9): 20-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2023.09.005.
[11] 许丽春, 林丽玉, 黄雨欣, 等. 基于潜在剖面分析的护士2期及以上压力性损伤知信行现状调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2024, 28(20): 7-11. DOI: 10.19435/j.1672-1721.2024.20.003.
[12] 王婷, 李金凤, 李伟. 自我效能感在护士感知的高绩效工作系统与工作幸福感间的中介作用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(14): 60-64. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.14.060.
[13] 付梦雪, 何平, 王永芬, 等. 突发公共卫生事件下基层医院护士的自我效能水平及其影响因素[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(19): 2314-2317. DOI: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2022.19.24.
[14] Nott M, Wiseman L, Seymour T, et al. Stroke self-management and the role of self-efficacy[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2021, 43(10): 1410-1419. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1666431.
[15] 史小娟, 程梦园, 雷云霄, 等. 手术室护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感的现状及影响因素[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2023, 39(14): 2448-2451, 2456. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2023.14.022.
[16] 戚钰千.运用萨提亚成长小组提升低年资护士自我效能感的行动研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学,2021.DOI:10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2021.002019.
[17] Boyko TV, Longaker MT, Yang GP. Review of the current management of pressure ulcers[J]. Adv Wound Care, 2018, 7(2): 57-67. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2016.0697.
[18] 金丽红, 陈圆圆, 邹继华, 等. 医联体基层医院联络护士压力性损伤护理的同质化培训[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(15): 65-68. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.15.065.
[19] 张凤坤, 郭宏鹏, 胡静, 等. 以伤口专科护士为主导预防骨科压力性损伤高风险患者的护理效果[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2024, 38(3): 409-411. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2024.03.039.
[20] 黄慧敏, 刘晶晶, 陈永侠, 等. 护士一般自我效能感及组织信任对知识共享的影响[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(11): 1034-1037. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.11.015.
[21] 杨小琴, 刘慧玲, 梁汉琼, 等. 以伤口造口专科护士为主导的区域责任制压力性损伤管理模式的构建与运行[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊), 2023, 30(7): 161-165. DOI: 10.19791/j.cnki.1006-6411.2023.07.050.
[22] 谷素丽, 张玲玲, 李莉莉, 等. ICU护士预防医疗器械相关压力性损伤知识及培训需求的调查分析[J]. 循证护理, 2024, 10(14): 2588-2592. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.2095-8668.2024.14.020.
[23] 高昌霞, 杨菲, 胡玉姣, 等. 改良BOPPPS法规范化培训对新入职护士压力性损伤教学效果的影响[J]. 当代护士(上旬刊), 2024, 31(10): 159-162. DOI: 10.19791/j.cnki.1006-6411.2024.10.043.
[24] 谢华, 周毅峰, 李君, 等. 手术室护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(3): 369-373. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.03.010.
[25] 陈英, 徐庆梅, 张磊. PBL-Seminar结合鲶鱼效应在ICU护士新技术能力培训中的应用[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(4): 563-568. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.04.030.

外科护士压力性损伤管理自我效能分型及影响因素的潜在剖面分析

Self-efficacy classification of stress injury management in surgical nurses and potential profile analysis of influencing factors

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	阳培汪玉泉王琦. 消瘦合并腹泻腹膜透析患者个性化皮肤护理实践的1例病例报告 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(10): 1753-1756.
[2]	黄伟珊林楚纯林瑾纯黄志铎陈基宇. 改良流体垫对俯卧位脊柱手术患者颜面部压力性损伤的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(18): 3150-3154.
[3]	梁艳东何伟枫刘秋江黎燕红庾佳燕. 不同角度俯卧位通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(12): 2063-2067.
[4]	宋丽艳臧正明马芳芳. 连续性末梢血流灌注指数对ICU患者压力性损伤预警作用的研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(4): 588-592.
[5]	丘学玲谭玮璐陈经欣杨春新. 中西医结合护理措施对肺部手术患者术后生活自理能力的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(20): 2971-2975.
[6]	江巧霞李柳英左曼曾雪玲. PDCA循环联合鱼骨图分析提升护士压力性损伤预防能力的效果观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(11): 1595-1598.