可视化系统与全流程管理在CT增强检查中的应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241226-07035

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1228-1232.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441417-20241226-07035

• 护理研究 • 上一篇

可视化系统与全流程管理在CT增强检查中的应用研究

张纯¹ 李智英² 赵俊¹ 陈静¹ 廖靓俊¹ 田丽³

¹湖北省第三人民医院放射科，武汉 430033；²湖北省第三人民医院护理部，武汉 430033；³湖北省第三人民医院神经外科，武汉 430033

收稿日期:2024-12-26 出版日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-04-18
通讯作者: 田丽，Email：393419816@qq.com
基金资助:
湖北省卫生健康委员会科研项目（WJ2023Z014、WJ2019F177）

Application of visualization system and whole process management in CT enhanced examination

Zhang Chun¹, Li Zhiying², Zhao Jun¹, Chen Jing¹, Liao Liangjun¹, Tian Li³

¹Department of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430033, China; ²Nursing Department, The Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430033, China; ³Neurosurgery, The Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430033, China

Received:2024-12-26 Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-04-18
Contact: Tian Li, Email: 393419816@qq.com
Supported by:
Scientific Research Project of Hubei Provincial Health Commission (WJ2023Z014, WJ2019F177)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　评估可视化系统结合全流程规范化管理在CT增强检查中的应用效果。方法　采用便利抽样法，选取2022年6月至2023年7月在湖北省第三人民医院放射科行CT增强检查的5 197例患者作为研究对象。2022年6月至2022年11月2 249例为对照组，其中男1 349例，女900例；年龄（58.32±1.25）岁。2023年2月至2023年7月2 948例为干预组，其中男1 713例，女1 235例；年龄（54.08±2.47）岁。对照组采用CT增强检查常规护理，干预组采用全流程、规范化护理。比较两组对比剂外渗发生率、外渗程度、水肿消退时间、影像质量（Likert评分量表）、满意度（自制调查问卷）。采用独立样本t检验、χ²检验和秩和检验进行统计学分析。结果　干预组对比剂外渗发生率低于对照组［0.37%（11/2 948）比0.89%（20/2 249）］（P<0.05）。干预组对比剂外渗程度优于对照组（P<0.05）。干预组水肿完全消退时间短于对照组［（31.56±1.74）h比（49.83±5.12）h］（P<0.05）。干预组影像质量及满意度评分均高于对照组［（4.81±0.33）分比（4.25±0.53）分、（9.12±0.29）分比（8.32±0.46）分］（均P<0.05）。结论　可视化系统结合全流程管理可有效提高CT增强检查质量和安全性，对改善患者体验和放射护理质量具有积极意义。

关键词:

CT增强检查, 可视化系统, 全流程管理, 对比剂外渗, 护理质量改进

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate the application effect of visualization system and whole process management in CT enhanced examination. Methods　A total of 5 197 patients who underwent enhanced CT examination in the Department of Radiology of the Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province from June 2022 to July 2023 were selected by the convenience sampling method as the study objects. From June 2022 to November 2022, 2 249 patients were selected a control group, including 1 349 males and 900 females, aged (58.32±1.25) years. From February 2023 to July 2023, 2 948 patients were selected an intervention group, including 1 713 males and 1 235 females, aged (54.08±2.47) years. The control group received routine nursing procedures, while the intervention group received visualization system and whole process management. The incidence of contrast agent extravasation, extravasation degree, edema remission time, image quality score (Likert score scale), and patient satisfaction (self-made questionnaire) were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, χ² test, and rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Results　The incidence of contrast agent extravasation in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group [0.37% (11/2 948) vs. 0.89% (20/2 249)] (P<0.05). The degree of contrast agent extravasation in the intervention group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). The complete remission time of edema in the intervention group was shorter than that in the control group [(31.56±1.74) h vs. (49.83±5.12) h] (P<0.05). The scores of image quality and patient satisfaction in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group [(4.81±0.33) points vs. (4.25±0.53) points, (9.12±0.29) points vs. (8.32±0.46) points] (both P<0.05). Conclusion　The combination of visualization system and whole process management can effectively improve the safety and quality of CT enhanced examination, provide a new reference mode for clinical nursing management, and has positive significance for improving patient experience and radiation nursing quality.

Key words:

CT enhanced examination, Visualization system, Whole process management, Contrast agent extravasation, Nursing quality improvement

张纯李智英赵俊陈静廖靓俊田丽.

可视化系统与全流程管理在CT增强检查中的应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2025, 31(7): 1228-1232.

Zhang Chun, Li Zhiying, Zhao Jun, Chen Jing, Liao Liangjun, Tian Li.

Application of visualization system and whole process management in CT enhanced examination [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2025, 31(7): 1228-1232.

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会影像技术分会医学影像护理专委会.影像增强检查静脉输注工具规范应用专家共识[J].中国医疗设备,2021,36(3):1-5.
[2] 中华医学会放射学分会放射护理专业委员会放射诊断护理学组.影像科碘对比剂输注安全专家共识[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(8):707-712.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008- 794X.2018.08.001.
[3] 史金雁,王巧红,柴云花.心理护理在64排螺旋CT冠状动脉血管造影检查中的应用效果[J].护理研究,2016,30(21):2677-2679.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.21.042.
[4] 祁凡骅.制度执行难的破解之道[J].人民论坛,2020,(14):46-48.
[5] 毛燕君,张素,张红梅.含碘对比剂静脉外渗护理管理实践指南[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(7):1008.
[6] 夏黎明.肿瘤患者CT增强扫描安全管理专家共识[J].放射学实践,2017,32(6):550-555.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000- 0313.2017.06.001.
[7] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.含碘对比剂在心血管疾病中临床应用的专家共识(2012)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(2):94-98.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2013.02.003.
[8] 韩雪,许亦权,刘洪臣.口腔临床实习生与老年患者医患沟通能力的思考[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2021,19(1):45-47.DOI:10.19749/j.cn.cjgd.1672-2973.2021.01.011.
[9] Jurado-Román A, Hernández-Hernández F, García-Tejada J, et al. Role of hydration in contrast-induced nephropathy in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2015, 115(9):1174-1178. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.004.
[10] van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury. Part 2: risk stratification, role of hydration and other prophylactic measures, patients taking metformin and chronic dialysis patients : recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(7):2856-2869. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5247-4.
[11] 武杰,杨金超,刘焱.心血管介入碘对比剂使用管理护理专家共识[J].中国循环杂志,2021,36(7):625-633.
[12] Y.Q.Fan,Q.Q.Cai,S.H.Chen,等.二甲双胍治疗病人对比剂管理指南的评价:共识、争议和差异[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2023,46(6):747-748.DOI:10.19300/j.2023.e0916.
[13] 卢靖,叶佩芝,郑琼蕾.标准化医护沟通模式联合流程化沟通模式在低文化程度、高龄行增强CT检查水化患者中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2024,21(8):183-187.DOI:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2024.08.43.
[14] Bellin MF, Jakobsen JA, Tomassin I, et al. Contrast medium extravasation injury: guidelines for prevention and management[J]. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(11):2807-2812. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1630-9.
[15] 中华护理学会内科专业委员会.含碘对比剂静脉外渗护理管理实践指南[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(7):1008.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.07.008.
[16] 李雪,郑淑梅,屈梅香.影像科碘对比剂输注安全专家共识[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(8):707-712.
[17] 常聪,陈圣杰,段书霞,等.生物医用水凝胶敷料的研究现状与应用前景[J].纺织导报,2018,(5):47-51.DOI:10.16481/j.cnki.ctl.2018.05.009.
[18] 操帅,张小红,何红,等.含碘对比剂静脉外渗护理管理实践指南的循证实践研究[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(9):56-60.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2024.09.056.
[19] 郭海丽.链式护理流程管理对预防CT增强扫描造影剂外渗的效果分析[J].护理研究,2022,36(1):168-170.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2022.01.033.
[20] 范媛媛,敬茜,周曾蓉.高压静脉注射碘对比剂渗漏因素及管理策略研究进展[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2024,22(10):165-167.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2024.10.054.

可视化系统与全流程管理在CT增强检查中的应用研究

Application of visualization system and whole process management in CT enhanced examination

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics