前列腺癌患者与主要照顾者相依关系对积极感受的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.13.027

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　基于主客体互倚模型（APIM）探讨前列腺癌患者与其主要照顾者相依关系对积极感受的影响。方法　该研究属于前瞻性、单中心试验。选取江南大学附属医院2021年5月至2023年5月收治的133例前列腺癌患者及其主要照顾者为研究对象，前列腺癌患者均为男性，年龄49～90（70.52±12.65）岁；主要照顾者男42名，女91名，年龄22～79（62.56±10.45）岁。参考相依关系量表（MS）、积极感受量表（PAC）调查患者与主要照顾者的相依关系、积极感受，采用t检验统计分析前列腺癌患者与主要照顾者相依关系评分、积极感受评分差异；采用Pearson分析前列腺癌患者与主要照顾者相依关系、积极感受的相关性；采用线性混合模型APIM分析前列腺癌患者与主要照顾者相依关系对积极感受的影响。结果　前列腺癌患者的相依关系中爱和感情维度评分、总分均高于主要照顾者［（4.45±0.77）分比（2.62±0.55）分、（15.75±2.88）分比（13.60±2.25）分］，积极感受中自我肯定、生活展望评分以及总分均低于主要照顾者［（12.34±2.11）分比（13.28±2.59）分、（13.46±2.53）分比（15.30±2.95）分、（25.80±4.25）分比（28.58±3.43）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=22.30、6.78、3.25、5.46、5.87，均P<0.05）；患者相依关系与主要照顾者相依关系、积极感受呈正相关（r=0.887、0.718，均P<0.001），患者积极感受与主要照顾者相依关系、积极感受呈正相关（r=0.590、0.527，均P<0.001）；主体效应上，患者及其主要照顾者的相依关系可影响自身的积极感受（β=0.474、0.485，均P<0.05）；客体效应上，患者及其主要照顾者的相依关系可影响对方的积极感受（β=0.356、0.265、0.344、0.315，均P<0.05）。结论　前列腺癌患者与其主要照顾者之间的相依关系评分与自身和对方的积极感受评分呈正相关，且经APIM模型验证其相依关系可正向影响二者积极感受。

关键词:

前列腺癌, 主客体互倚模型, 主要照顾者, 相依关系, 积极感受

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the influence of the dependence between patients with prostate cancer and their primary caregivers on positive feelings based on the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM). Methods　This study was a prospective and single-center trial. One hundred and thirty-three patients with prostate cancer treated at Hospital Affiliated to Jiangnan University from May 2021 to May 2023 and their main caregivers were selected as the research objects; the patients were 49-90 (70.52±12.65) years old; among the caregivers, there were 42 males and 91 females who were 22-79 (62.56±10.45) years old. The dependence and positive feelings of the patients and their main caregivers were investigated by the Dependence Scale (MS) and Positive Feeling Scale (PAC). t test was used to statistically analyze the differences of dependency score and positive feeling score between the patients and their main caregivers. Pearson analysis was used to analyze the dependence and positive feelings of the patients and their main caregivers. The linear mixed model APIM was used to analyze the influence of dependence between the prostate cancer patients and their main caregivers on positive feelings. Results　The scores of love and affection dimensions and total score in the dependent relationship of the prostate cancer patients were higher than those of the primary caregivers [(4.45±0.77) vs. (2.62±0.55) and (15.75±2.88) vs. (13.60±2.25)]; the scores of self-affirmation and life outlook and total score in positive feelings of the patients were lower than those of their primary caregivers [(12.34±2.11) vs. (13.28±2.59), (13.46±2.53) vs. (15.30±2.95), and (25.80±4.25) vs. (28.58±3.43)]; there were statistical differences (t=22.30, 6.78, 3.25, 5.46 and 5.87; all P<0.05). The patients' dependence was positively correlated with the caregivers' dependence and positive feelings (r=0.887 and 0.718; both P<0.001); the patients' positive feelings was positively correlated with the caregivers' dependence and positive feelings (r=0.590 and 0.527; both P<0.001). On the subjective effect, the dependence between the patients and their caregivers could affect their positive feelings (β=0.474 and 0.485; both P<0.05). On the object effect, the dependence between the patients and their caregivers could affect each other's positive feelings (β=0.356, 0.265, 0.344, and 0.315; all P<0.05). Conclusion　The score of dependence between patients with prostate cancer and their main caregivers is positively correlated with the score of their own and each other's positive feelings, and it is verified by the APIM that their dependence can positively affect their positive feelings.

Key words:

Prostate cancer, Actor-partner interdependence model, Primary caregivers, Dependence, Positive feeling

张燕糜远源孙丽雅许源.

前列腺癌患者与主要照顾者相依关系对积极感受的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(13): 2253-2259.

Zhang Yan, Mi Yuanyuan, Sun Liya, Xu Yuan.

Influence of dependence between patients with prostate cancer and their primary caregivers on positive feeling [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(13): 2253-2259.

参考文献

[1] Lee C, Light A, Alaa A,et al. Application of a novel machine learning framework for predicting non-metastatic prostate cancer-specific mortality in men using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database[J]. Lancet Digit Health, 2021,3(3):e158-e165.DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30314-9.
[2] Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F,et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a patient and caregiver perspective and plain language summary of the ARASENS trial[J]. Future Oncol,2022,18(21):2585-2597.DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0433.
[3] Suor JH, Granros M, Calentino AE,et al. The interplay of childhood maltreatment and maternal depression in relation to the reward positivity in youth[J]. Dev Psychopathol,2023,35(1):168-178.DOI: 10.1017/S0954579421000857.
[4] 唐雪鸿,邓卫红,潘志婷,等. 积极感受在脑卒中主要照顾者相依关系与照顾负担的中介效果[J]. 中国临床护理,2022,14(2):82-85. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2022.02.004.
[5] Aguilar-Raab C, Winter F, Jarczok MN,et al. Feeling low and unhappy together? An actor-partner-interdependence model uncovering the linkage between different operationalizations of relationship quality and depression in different-sex couples[J]. PLoS One, 2022,17(11):e0274756.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274756.
[6] 中华医学会泌尿外科分会. 前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[J]. 继续医学教育,2007,21(6):30-39. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1004-6763.2007.06.010.
[7] Crist JD, Escandón S, Stewart BJ,et al. The spanish version of the mutuality scale: evidence for the cultural equivalence of mutuality in mexican American families[J]. Res Gerontol Nurs,2008,1(4):285-294.DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20081001-05.
[8] Palacio Gonzalez C, Roman-Calderón JP, Limonero JT. The relationship between positive aspects of caring, anxiety and depression in the caregivers of cancer patients: the mediational role of burden[J]. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 2021,30(1):e13346.DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13346.
[9] James C, Brunckhorst O, Eymech O,et al. Fear of cancer recurrence and PSA anxiety in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022,30(7):5577-5589.DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06876-z.
[10] 魏健文,尹文俊,陈泽楷,等. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后电生理技术早期干预恢复控尿功能的临床疗效观察[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(8):1038-1041. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2022.08.001.
[11] Zhu Y, Freedland SJ, Ye D. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases best of asia, 2019: challenges and opportunities[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis,2020,23(2):197-198.DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0193-7.
[12] Mardani A, Farahani MA, Khachian A,et al. Fear of cancer recurrence and coping strategies among prostate cancer survivors: a qualitative study[J]. Curr Oncol, 2023,30(7):6720-6733.DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070493.
[13] De Nunzio C, Lombardo R. Best of 2022 in prostate cancer and prostatic diseases[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2023,26(1):5-7.DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00652-8.
[14] Elshafae SM, Dirksen WP, Alasonyalilar-Demirer A,et al. Canine prostatic cancer cell line (LuMa) with osteoblastic bone metastasis[J]. Prostate, 2020 ,80(9):698-714.DOI: 10.1002/pros.23983.
[15] 张笑倩,王旻静,刘玲珑,等. 胰腺癌术后患者主要照顾者相依关系现状及其与领悟社会支持和心理弹性的相关性分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(14):1865-1870. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20191205-04456.
[16] Ann-Yi S, Bruera E. Psychological aspects of care in cancer patients in the last weeks/days of life[J]. Cancer Res Treat,2022,54(3):651-660.DOI: 10.4143/crt.2022.116.
[17] Mihic-Góngora L, Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, Velasco V,et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care and psychological impact on cancer patients[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care,2022,16(3):138-143.DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000614.
[18] Lingens SP, Hagedoorn M, Zhu L,et al. Trajectories of fatigue in cancer patients during psychological care[J]. Psychol Health, 2022 ,37(8):1002-1021. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1916493.
[19] 丁晓彤,丁亚萍,许勤,等. 癌症患者主要照顾者积极感受与依恋、社会支持的关系研究[J]. 中华全科医学,2019,17(12):2111-2114. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152. 001140.
[20] 彭元元,孙国珍,王洁,等. 慢性心力衰竭患者和家庭照顾者相依关系对双方正性情绪及积极应对方式的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(7):846-850. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200922-05474.
[21] 王晓莹,管芝玲,山慧,等. 相依关系在糖尿病足截肢患者主要照顾者照顾负担与心理健康间的调节效应研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2022,39(7):70-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 2097-1826.2022.07.018.
[22] Hernandez NJ, Bislick L, Engelhoven A,et al. Self-report and caregiver proxy-report agreement of perceived chronic stress and mutuality in poststroke aphasia[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2021,30(4):1700-1710.DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00248.
[23] Fofi L, Altamura C, Fiorentini G,et al. Improving distress perception and mutuality in migraine caregivers after 6 months of galcanezumab treatment[J]. Headache, 2022 ,62(9):1143-1147.DOI: 10.1111/head.14400.
[24] Vicente JB, Sanguino GZ, Riccioppo MRPL,at al. Syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis: women's experiences from the perspective of symbolic interactionism[J]. Rev Bras Enferm,2022,76(1):e20220210.DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0210.
[25] Sterling MR, Barbaranelli C, Riegel B,et al. The influence of preparedness, mutuality, and self-efficacy on home care workers' contribution to self-care in heart failure: a structural equation modeling analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs,2022,37(2):146-157.DOI: 10.1097/JCN. 0000000000000768.
[26] Gilbert E, Villa D, Riley GA. A scoping review of psychosocial interventions to enhance the relationship of couples living with dementia[J]. Dementia (London), 2023,22(5):1164-1198.DOI: 10.1177/14713012231166474.
[27] 张士变,李晓燕,李瑞玲,等. 自我效能、相依关系在脑卒中患者照顾者照顾准备度与照顾压力间的链式中介作用[J]. 中国临床护理,2023,15(12):727-731,737. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2023.12.001.
[28] Karlstedt M, Fereshtehnejad SM, Aarsland D,et al. Mediating effect of mutuality on caregiver burden in parkinson's disease partners[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2020,24(9):1421-1428.DOI: 10.1080/13607863. 2019. 1619165.
[29] Dellafiore F, Chung ML, Alvaro R,et al. Influence of mutuality on quality of life in heart failure patient with inadequate self-care and caregiver dyads: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs,2022,21(4):366-373.DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab089.
[30] Bannon SM, Cornelius T, Gates MV,et al. Emotional distress in neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads: the recovering together randomized clinical trial[J]. Health Psychol,2022,41(4):268-277.DOI: 10.1037/hea0001102.