F形空心钉固定与传统平行钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折患者的效果比较

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.07.017

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1142-1146.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.07.017

F形空心钉固定与传统平行钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折患者的效果比较

彭良贞张凤海

信阳一五四医院创伤骨科C区，信阳　464000

收稿日期:2023-10-03 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-05-04
通讯作者: 彭良贞，Email：penggliangzhen@163.com
基金资助:
河南省医学科技攻关项目（LHGJ20210022183）

Effects of fixation with F shape hollow nails versus with traditional parallel nails for patients with femoral neck fractures

Peng Liangzhen, Zhang Fenghai

Area C, Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Xinyang 154th Hospital, Xinyang 464000, China

Received:2023-10-03 Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-05-04
Contact: Peng Liangzhen, Email:penggliangzhen@163.com
Supported by:
Problem-tackling Project of Medical Science and Technology in Henan (LHGJ20210022183)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　观察不同空心钉分布技术在股骨颈骨折切开复位内固定术中的应用效果及对患者髋关节功能、骨折愈合情况的影响。方法　开展前瞻性随机对照试验。选取2020年5月至2021年5月信阳一五四医院收治的120例股骨颈骨折患者作为研究对象，采用抽签法分为A组和B组，各60例。A组男32例、女28例，年龄（55.26±5.17）岁，骨折病程2～14（8.33±0.21）d，Garden骨折分型：Ⅰ～Ⅱ型27例、Ⅲ～Ⅳ型33例，采用传统平行钉固定；B组男30例、女30例，年龄（55.31±5.22）岁，骨折病程3～13（8.35±0.16）d，Garden骨折分型：Ⅰ～Ⅱ型25例、Ⅲ～Ⅳ型35例，应用F形空心钉固定。对比两组患者手术情况、术后髋关节功能恢复情况、术后3个月内骨折愈合及术后并发症发生情况。统计学方法采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中照射时间比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。治疗前，两组患者疼痛、功能、畸形、关节活动度评分比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；治疗后，B组疼痛、功能、畸形、关节活动度评分均高于A组［（38.74±0.82）分比（38.41±0.25）分、（40.56±0.83）分比（40.27±0.22）分、（3.57±0.88）分比（3.25±0.31）分、（3.61±0.85）分比（3.36±0.25）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.982、2.616、2.657、2.186，均P<0.05）。在不同治疗方案下，B组术后3个月内骨折愈合率高于A组［86.67%（52/60）比68.33%（41/60）］，骨折愈合时间短于A组［（4.25±0.31）个月比（4.58±0.86）个月］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=5.175，t=2.796；均P<0.05）。B组术后并发症发生率为6.67%（4/60），低于A组的18.33%（11/60），差异有统计学意义（χ²=6.215，P=0.013）。结论　与传统平行钉固定相比，在股骨颈骨折切开复位内固定术中应用F形空心钉固定效果较好，对促进患者术后髋关节功能恢复、加快骨折愈合进程、降低术后并发症发生风险均有积极意义。

关键词:

股骨颈骨折, 切开复位内固定术, 空心钉, 平行钉, 髋关节功能

Abstract:

Objective　To observe the effects of different hollow nail distribution techniques in open reduction and internal fixation for patients with femoral neck fractures and the influence on hip joint function and fracture healing. Methods　One hundred and twenty patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Xinyang 154th Hospital from May 2021 to May 2022 were selected for the randomized controlled trial. The patients were divided into group A and group B by lottery, with 60 cases in each group. There were 32 males and 28 females in group A; they were (55.26±5.17) years old; the fracture course was 2-14 (8.33±0.21) d; there were 27 cases of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ and 33 cases of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ of Garden fracture typing. There were 30 males and 30 females in group B; they were (55.31±5.22) years old; the fracture course was 3-13 (8.35±0.16) d; there were 25 cases of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ and 35 cases of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ of Garden fracture typing. Group A took the fixation by traditional parallel nails, and group B by F shape hollow nails. The surgical conditions, postoperative hip joint function recovery, fracture healing within 3 months after surgery, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. t and χ² tests were used. Results　There were no statistical differences in the surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative irradiation time between the two groups (all P>0.05). Before the surgery, there were no statistical differences in the scores of pain, function, malformation, and joint movement range between the two groups (all P>0.05). After the surgery, the scores of pain, function, malformation, and joint movement range in group B were higher than those in group A [(38.74±0.82) vs. (38.41±0.25), (40.56±0.83) vs. (40.27±0.22), (3.57±0.88) vs. (3.25±0.31), and (3.61±0.85) vs. (3.36±0.25)], with statistical differences (t=2.982, 2.616, 2.657, and 2.186; all P<0.05). Under different fixation techniques, the fracture healed rate within 3 months after the surgery and the fracture healing time in group B were better than those in group A [86.67% (52/60) vs. 68.33% (41/60) and (4.25±0.31) months vs. (4.58±0.86) months], with statistical differences (χ²=5.175; t=2.796; both P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications of group B was lower than that of group A [6.67% (4/60) vs. 8.33% (11/60)], with a statistical difference (χ²=6.215; P=0.013). Conclusion　Compared with traditional parallel nails, the application of F shape hollow nails in open reduction and internal fixation for patients with femoral neck fractures has better effect, and is of positive significance in promoting their recovery of hip joint function, accelerating the process of fracture healing, and reducing the risk of postoperative complications.

Key words:

Femoral neck fractures, Open reduction and internal fixation, Hollow nails, Parallel nails, Hip joint function

彭良贞张凤海.

F形空心钉固定与传统平行钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折患者的效果比较 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1142-1146.

Peng Liangzhen, Zhang Fenghai.

Effects of fixation with F shape hollow nails versus with traditional parallel nails for patients with femoral neck fractures [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(7): 1142-1146.

参考文献

[1] Wang Y, Ma JX, Yin T, et al. Correlation between reduction quality of femoral neck fracture and femoral head necrosis based on biomechanics[J].Orthop Surg,2019,11(2):318-324.DOI:10.1111/os.12458.
[2] 周瑜斌,黄金亮,杨勇. 经直接前侧入路切开复位空心螺纹钉内固定术治疗青壮年难复性股骨颈骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 医疗装备,2022,35(18):84-86.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2022.18.027.
[3] 刘爱民,李栋. 平行空心钉固定技术在股骨颈骨折治疗中退钉对骨折愈合的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019,19(5):763-765.DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2019.05.031.
[4] 贺延雷,李强,李国良. "F"形空心钉与空心螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的效果比较[J]. 医学信息,2020,33(8):113-115.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.035.
[5] Fischer H, Maleitzke T, Eder C, et al. Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options[J].Eur J Med Res,2021,26(1):86.DOI:10.1186/s40001-021-00556-0.
[6] 张瑞鹏,尹英超,李石伦,等. 髋部骨折指南解读与诊疗现状分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2018,39(6):621-622,627.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2018.06.001.
[7] Li F, Zhu L, Geng Y, et al. Effect of hip replacement surgery on clinical efficacy, VAS score and Harris hip score in patients with femoral head necrosis[J].Am J Transl Res,2021,13(4):3851-3855.
[8] 滕延斌,李亭亭,王磊,等. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后骨折不愈合或畸形愈合的危险因素分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(9):799-803.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115530- 20200428-00294.
[9] 刘立志. 切开复位内固定术与髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折效果的比较性研究[J]. 双足与保健,2018,27(5):119-120.DOI:10.19589/j.cnki.issn1004-6569.2018.05.119.
[10] 何莹莹,陈进芬,张小丽,等.老年股骨颈骨折围手术期精准护理干预效果观察[J].现代医院,2024,24(2):325-328.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2024.02.044.
[11] 黄波,张民勇,陈玉娟,等. 全髋关节置换与内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的临床效果研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2018,29(13):2080-2081.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8174.2018.13.031.
[12] 朱宗东,肖成伟,袁加斌,等. 单纯股骨颈骨折平行置钉三点固定与非三点固定的临床疗效观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(6):169-171.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170. 2019.06.054.
[13] 陈建. 关节镜辅助下复位联合经皮空心钉"F"形置钉技术内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的效果研究[J]. 吉林医学,2022,43(8):2086-2087.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412. 2022.08.018.
[14] 许景红,汤志辉,毛成鹏,等. "F"形空心钉内固定技术治疗股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J]. 实用骨科杂志,2018,24(6):516-518. DOI:10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2018.06.008.
[15] 王子凡,缪佳庆. 空心钉F形内固定骨质疏松性Pauwels Ⅱ型股骨颈骨折的体外生物力学研究[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(2):153-155.DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935. 2020.02.013.
[16] 程文静,丁国正,谢家兵,等. F形空心钉与传统3枚平行钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型,股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨伤,2022,35(7):678-682.DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034. 2022.07.016.

F形空心钉固定与传统平行钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折患者的效果比较

Effects of fixation with F shape hollow nails versus with traditional parallel nails for patients with femoral neck fractures

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王小燕胡泊. 运动功能评估指导下的个体化康复锻炼对股骨颈骨折患者的应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(16): 2343-2347.
[2]	张晓, 马胜利, 李磊, 韩田浦. 防旋型股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果及其对髋关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(5): 633-636.