腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.05.025

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 829-833.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.05.025

腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果

孟雅静¹ 任俊屹²

¹宝鸡市妇幼保健院麻醉科，宝鸡　721000；²宝鸡市中心医院麻醉科，宝鸡　721008

收稿日期:2023-12-08 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-03-29
通讯作者: 任俊屹，Email：76427340@qq.com
基金资助:
陕西省重点研发计划（2021SF-211）

Effect of spinal-epidural anesthesia for parturients taking painless delivery

Meng Yajing¹, Ren Junyi²

¹Department of Anesthesiology, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Baoji 721000, China; ²Department of Anesthesiology, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji 721008, China

Received:2023-12-08 Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-29
Contact: Ren Junyi, Email: 76427340@qq.com
Supported by:
Ren Junyi, Email: 76427340@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果。方法　选取2021年6月至2023年6月宝鸡市妇幼保健院收治的302例拟行无痛分娩的产妇进行前瞻性研究，按随机数字表法分为对照组、研究组，各151例。对照组年龄（28.69±3.77）岁，孕周（39.14±1.15）周，使用硬膜外麻醉；研究组年龄（28.72±3.81）岁，孕周（39.16±1.10）周，使用腰硬联合麻醉。比较两组产妇分娩相关指标、应激指标、分娩结局等，采用t检验、χ²检验进行统计分析。结果　与对照组比较，研究组第一产程、第二产程、总产程、麻醉起效时间、肠道蠕动恢复时间、住院时间、初乳时间均较短，产后2 h出血量较少，麻醉持续时间较长，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；研究组产妇第二、三产程与宫口全开时视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分、分娩成功后Bro-mage评分较低，产后24 h泌乳量评分较高，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。产后24 h对照组与研究组血清皮质醇（COR）水平［（33.66±4.53）mg/L、（18.44±3.61）mg/L］、去甲肾上腺素（NE）水平［（158.16±16.54）ng/L、（142.35±15.48）ng/L］、前列腺素E2（PGE2）水平［（99.36±8.62）ng/L、（90.12±8.47）ng/L］、P物质（SP）水平［（4.12±0.58）mg/L、（3.47±0.45）mg/L］、泌乳素（PRL）水平［（245.63±24.12）μg/L、（276.30±25.78）μg/L］均高于产前，对照组血清COR、NE、PGE2、SP水平变化更明显（t=32.288、20.106、9.395、10.880，均P<0.001），研究组血清PRL水平变化更明显（t=10.675，P<0.001）。两组产妇分娩结局比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论　无痛分娩产妇中应用腰硬联合麻醉，能有效缩短产程，减少应激指标、致痛因子表达，减轻疼痛程度，改善泌乳功能，且分娩结局良好。

关键词:

腰硬联合麻醉, 无痛分娩, 致痛因子, 泌乳功能

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the effect of spinal-epidural anesthesia for parturients taking painless delivery. Methods　A prospective study was conducted on 302 parturients who were admitted to Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital for painless delivery from June 2021 to June 2023. They were divided into a control group and a research group by the random number table method, with 151 cases in each group. The control group were (28.69±3.77) years old and (39.14±1.15) weeks pregnant, and took epidural anesthesia. The research group were (28.72±3.81) years old and (39.16±1.10) weeks pregnant, and took spinal-epidural anesthesia. The delivery-related indicators, stress indicators, and delivery outcomes were compared between the two groups. t and χ² tests were applied. Results　Compared with those in the control group, the first and second stages of labor, the total stage of labor, the onset time of anesthesia, the recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, and the hospitalization time in the research group were shorter, the bleeding volume 2 hours after delivery in the research group was lower, and the duration of anesthesia in the research group was longer; there were statistical differences (all P<0.05). The scores of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the second and third stages of labor and when the cervix was fully open and the Bro-mage score of the parturient after successful delivery in the research group were lower than those in the control group; the score of milk yield 24 h after delivery in the research group was higher than that in the control group; there were statistical differences (all P<0.05). Twenty-four hours after delivery, the serum levels of cortisol (COR) [(33.66±4.53) mg/L and (18.44±3.61) mg/L], norepinephrine (NE) [(158.16±16.54) ng/L and (142.35±15.48) ng/L], prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [(99.36±8.62) ng/L and (90.12±8.47) ng/L], substance P (SP) [(4.12±0.58) mg/L and (3.47±0.45) mg/L], and prolactin (PRL) [(245.63±24.12) μg/L and (276.30±25.78) μg/L] in the control group and the research group were higher than those before delivery, the changes of serum COR, NE, PGE2, SP, and PRL of the research group were more obvious (t=32.288, 20.106, 9.395, 10.880, and 10.675; all P<0.001). There were no statistical differences in the delivery outcomes between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion　The application of spinal-epidural anesthesia in parturients taking painless delivery can shorten the labor stages, reduce the expression of stress indicators and pain-causing factors, relieve their pain, and improve their lactation function, and have good delivery outcomes.

Key words:

Spinal-epidural anesthesia, Painless delivery, Pain-causing factors, Lactation function

孟雅静任俊屹.

腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(5): 829-833.

Meng Yajing, Ren Junyi.

Effect of spinal-epidural anesthesia for parturients taking painless delivery [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(5): 829-833.

参考文献

[1] Ngan Kee WD, Lee SWY, Ng FF, et al. Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic non-inferiority study of neonatal outcome[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020,125(4):588-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.057.
[2] 杨万福,李洁.分娩镇痛应用罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定效果研究[J].创伤与急危重病医学,2022,10(6):438-441.DOI:10.16048/j.issn.2095-5561.2022.06.13.
[3] Miyazaki H, Miura D, Koguchi Y, et al. Intraoperative serum catecholamine levels in a pregnant woman with pheochromocytoma undergoing cesarean delivery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case report[J]. Cureus, 2022,14(5):e24727. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24727.
[4] 李铮,徐国亭,吴昊,等.罗哌卡因与利多卡因在局部浸润麻醉中对自然分娩产妇镇痛效果的研究[J].中国临床实用医学,2023,14(1):47-51.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115570- 20221117-02347.
[5] 陈秀兰,梁亚贵,翁迪贵.腰硬联合麻醉及连续硬膜外麻醉在顺产经产妇无痛分娩的应用[J].福建医科大学学报,2021,55(4):343-345.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4194. 2021.04.015.
[6] 陈炯光,吕蕊,吕小倩.初产妇分娩镇痛中应用小剂量布比卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉的效果及对新生儿结局的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(05):83-84.DOI:10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2019.05.041.
[7] 王玲玲,彭贵青,赵崇法.无痛分娩产妇腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对促肾上腺皮质激素皮质醇及C-反应蛋白水平的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(24):4884-4886.DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.24.078.
[8] 肖玮,王天龙.美国麻醉医师协会(2012)年会精读——日间手术及相关麻醉领域进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2013,34(10):865-866,876.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4378.2013.10.001.
[9] Al-Metwalli RR, Mowafi HA, Abouzaid HA, et al. Isometric force dynamometer is superior to bromage score in prediction of patients' ambulation after spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgeries[J]. Anesth Analg, 2013,116(2):312-316. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318275e8c7.
[10] Michel A. Review of the Reliability and validity of the apgar score[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2022,22(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000859.
[11] Faiz KW. VAS--visuell analog skala [VAS--visual analog scale][J]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2014,134(3):323. DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1145.
[12] Borja A, Ehrig J, Vanderhoef K, et al. Effect of encouraging a combined spinal epidural technique for cesarean delivery anesthesia[J]. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2022,35(5):591-594. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2075684.
[13] Suzuki M, Sato C, Nishii H, et al. The effects of the use of diluted bupivacaine in sequential combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal hypotension and motor block after surgery: a retrospective observational study[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2022,89(5):533-539. DOI: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2022_89-514.
[14] 韩斌,徐铭军,白云波.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼连续蛛网膜下腔阻滞用于全产程分娩镇痛的临床效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(2):115-119.DOI:10.12089/jca.2020.02.002.
[15] 赵蕊,杨永朋.小剂量罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉对产妇无痛分娩镇痛情况、产程时间及新生儿结局的影响[J].医学临床研究,2022,39(4):528-531.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.04.014.
[16] 刘虎翼,蔡香稻,陈华群,等.初产妇应用分娩镇痛仪与腰硬联合阻滞麻醉镇痛的疗效观察[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2022,28(1):69-72.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115668- 20210928-00194.
[17] 吕国栋,夏雨,齐超,等.罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中临床应用价值研究[J].临床军医杂志,2019,47(9):1005-1006.DOI:10.16680/j.1671-3826. 2019.09.46.
[18] 张璞.腰硬联合阻滞与瑞芬太尼静脉镇痛对全程分娩的镇痛效果比较[J].医药导报,2019,38(8):1033-1037.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2019.08.012.
[19] 王玥,康凯,白云波,等.腰-硬联合阻滞及连续蛛网下腔阻滞对产妇分娩镇痛效果[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(5):921-925.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.05.017.
[20] 刘野,徐铭军.腰硬联合镇痛法应用于分娩镇痛的疗效及安全性评价[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(10):1145-1149.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2020.10.004.
[21] 邢亚伟.不同剂量罗哌卡因辅助硬膜外麻醉对产妇分娩的镇痛效果研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2023,29(11):1528-1532.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.11.011.
[22] 朱立杰,吕小静,闫战秋,等.硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞与腰硬联合阻滞在初产妇分娩镇痛中的应用效果及对母婴安全的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2021,13(12):35-38.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2021.12.10.
[23] 周国庆.小剂量罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉用于无痛分娩中对母婴结局的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2020,48(11):1387-1390.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2020.11.028.
[24] 安璐.腰硬联合麻醉在重度子痫前期剖宫产患者中的麻醉效果[J].哈尔滨医药,2021,41(2):72-73.
[25] 徐淑兰,尹军,于永生,等.腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛中规律间断注射舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因对分娩结局、产间发热及镇痛效果的影响[J].广西医学,2020,42(9):1096-1099.DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2020.09.10.
[26] 丁金玉,蔡红霞,李敏红.不同麻醉方式用于无痛分娩的效果[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2020,41(4):653-656.DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852.2018.1250.
[27] 仇丽雅,吴超贤,蔡波.无痛分娩不同麻醉方案对产妇泌乳功能、肠道功能及应激反应的影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2023,31(1):85-89.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189. 2023.01.018.
[28] 董小强,刘明,李宁,等.罗哌卡因与舒芬太尼腰-硬联合分娩镇痛的临床效果[J].江苏医药,2022,48(4):398-401,406.DOI:10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2022.04.018.
[29] 曹雅军,吴文春,董敏,等.不同硬膜外麻醉方案对初产妇疼痛和产后盆底功能的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2023,40(12):1146-1150.DOI:10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.12.009.

腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩产妇中的应用效果

Effect of spinal-epidural anesthesia for parturients taking painless delivery

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	马传燕张桥韩海霞李晶张健. 不同硬膜外自控镇痛方法对无痛分娩产妇妊娠结局的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(5): 647-651.
[2]	王晓莉段秀君张丽娟徐燕利李焕敏. 无痛分娩联合音乐疗法对自然分娩产妇的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(20): 2947-2950.
[3]	黎笑峰, 梁燕红, 王源. 无痛分娩产时发热产妇第二产程积极干预的临床实践[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(12): 1746-1748.