不同电生理检测方法在诊断肘管综合征中的应用价值

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.02.024

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 297-300.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.02.024

不同电生理检测方法在诊断肘管综合征中的应用价值

宋欢欢¹ 洪钱²

¹南京中医药大学连云港附属医院脑电图诊断科，连云港　222004；²南京中医药大学连云港附属医院骨伤科，连云港　222004

收稿日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-02-02
通讯作者: 洪钱，Email：15161305516@163.com
基金资助:
南京医科大学康达学院2019年度科研发展基金课题（KD2019KYJJYB025）

Value of different electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome

Song Huanhuan¹, Hong Qian²

¹Department of EEG Diagnosis, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital, Lianyungang 222004, China; ²Department of Orthopaedics, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital, Lianyungang 222004, China

Received:2023-04-11 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-02-02
Contact: Hong Qian, Email: 15161305516@163.com
Supported by:
Research and Development Fund Project of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University in 2019 (KD2019KYJJYB025)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析不同电生理检测方法在诊断肘管综合征（CuTS）中的应用价值。方法　搜集2019年10月至2022年10月期间于南京中医药大学连云港附属医院临床诊断为CuTS的患者共45例（90个上肢）作为观察组，男31例，女14例，年龄26～81（51.3±13.1）岁；90个上肢根据有无CuTS临床症状分为有症状肢体组（50肢）和无症状肢体组（40肢）。并纳入同期健康志愿者30例（60个上肢）作为对照组，男20例，女10例，年龄28～79（50.3±11.6）岁。进行神经传导速度（NCV）、针极肌电图（EMG）、短段微移传导时间（SSCT）测定，比较两组相关参数差异。采用独立样本t检验和χ²检验。结果　与对照组比较，观察组尺神经运动神经传导速度（MNCV）在腕段-肘下段［（50.79±5.98）m/s比（59.15±5.15）m/s］、肘下段-肘上段［（48.07±7.14）m/s比（55.77±5.35）m/s］减慢，复合肌肉动作电位（CMAP）波幅在腕段［（9.16±4.18）mV比（13.91±4.25）mV］、肘下段5 cm［（7.63±3.59）mV比（13.46±3.92）mV］、肘上段5 cm［（8.27±3.73）mV比（13.02±3.70）mV］降低，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。无症状肢体组中NCV异常率为12.5%（5/40），与SSCT检测异常率［45.0%（18/40）］比较，差异有统计学意义（χ²=10.313，P=0.001）。应用SSCT检测法卡压区域大多分布于肘上3 cm至肘下2 cm（共5 cm）的位置，占明确标记的96.9%，其中肘上1 cm卡压率最高。结论　不同电生理检测方式对临床早期定位、定性诊断及治疗有重要的指导价值，其中SSCT是早期诊断CuTS、明确卡压位点的重要检测方式。

关键词:

肘管综合征, 短段微移传导时间, 定位诊断, 电生理

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the application value of different electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Methods　A total of 45 patients (90 upper limbs) clinically diagnosed with CuTS in Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital from October 2019 to October 2022 were collected as the observation group, including 31 males and 14 females, aged 26 to 81 (51.3±13.1) years. The 90 upper limbs were divided into a symptomatic limb group (50 limbs) and an asymptomatic limb group (40 limbs) according to whether there were the clinical symptoms of CuTS or not. In addition, 30 healthy volunteers (60 upper limbs) were selected as the control group, including 20 males and 10 females, aged 28 to 79 (50.3±11.6) years. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV), needle electromyography (EMG) and short-segment micro-shift conduction time (SSCT) were measured, and the relevant parameters were compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test and χ² test were used. Results　Compared with those in the control group, the motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) of the ulnar nerve in the observation group decreased in the wrist-lower elbow segment [(50.79±5.98) m/s vs. (59.15±5.15) m/s] and the lower-upper elbow segment [(48.07±7.14) m/s vs. (55.77±5.35) m/s], and the complex muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude decreased in the wrist segment [(9.16±4.18) mV vs. (13.91±4.25) mV], 5 cm of lower elbow segment [(7.63±3.59) mV vs. (13.46±3.92) mV], and 5 cm of upper elbow segment [(8.27±3.73) mV vs. (13.02±3.70) mV], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). In the asymptomatic limb group, the abnormal rate of NCV was 12.5% (5/40), there was a statistically significant difference compared with that of SSCT detection [45.0% (18/40)] (χ²=10.313, P=0.001). Most of the compression areas detected by SSCT were located from 3 cm above the elbow to 2 cm below the elbow (total 5 cm), accounting for 96.9% of the marked areas. The compression rate of 1 cm above the elbow was the highest. Conclusions　Different electrophysiological detection methods play an important role in early diagnosis, qualitative diagnosis, and treatment. SSCT is an important detection method for early diagnosis of CuTS and identification of compression sites.

Key words:

Cubital tunnel syndrome, Short-segment micro-shift conduction time, Localization diagnosis, Electrophysiology

宋欢欢洪钱.

不同电生理检测方法在诊断肘管综合征中的应用价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(2): 297-300.

Song Huanhuan, Hong Qian.

Value of different electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(2): 297-300.

参考文献

[1] 郭瑞鹏,常文凯.肘管综合征诊治研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2021,42(2):71-75.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083. 2021.02.002.
[2] 殷宝月,宋银玲,杨洋,等.认知行为干预在肘管综合征患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(36):4964-4969.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210309-01035.
[3] 代丽,余航,陈华,等.针灸结合黄芪桂枝五物汤对保守治疗肘管综合征患者IL-1、NGF和功能恢复的影响[J].长春中医药大学学报,2022,38(9):1011-1014.DOI:10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2022.09.016.
[4] 柳三凤,庄智勇,蔡金表,等.神经电生理在肘管综合征分期诊断中的应用价值[J].现代电生理学杂志,2021,28(2):110-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0458.2021.02.011.
[5] 史淼,亓恒涛,陈枫,等.短节段神经传导检测联合高频超声检查定位定性诊断肘管综合征[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2016,10(16):2427-2433.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.16.013.
[6] 袁宇,彭志恒,徐林.肘管综合征的诊断及治疗进展[J].实用手外科杂志,2021,35(1):91-96.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671- 2722.2021.01.028.
[7] 张凯莉,徐建光.临床实用神经肌电图诊疗技术[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004:101,107,118.
[8] Yushan M, Abula A, Ren P, et al. Outcomes of revision neurolysis of the ulnar nerve and ulnar groove plasty for persistent and recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome-a retrospective study of 21 cases[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(2):329-333. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.003.
[9] 段小圆,邢国胜,赵文君,等.超声检查在肘管综合征诊疗中的应用与研究进展[J].中医正骨,2022,34(4):33-37.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2022.04.007.
[10] 李贵阳,张立霞.肘管综合征患者神经电生理特点[J].现代电生理学杂志,2022,29(1):12-15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0458.2022.01.003.
[11] 顾玉东.腕管综合征与肘管综合征的临床分型现状与建议[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(7):818-819.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.07.019.
[12] 张宏亮,李身泰,李明,等.运动神经传导速度在肘管综合征分型中的应用[J].河北医科大学学报,2019,40(3):296-299.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2019.03.011.
[13] 童劲松,董震.周围神经卡压的诊疗进展[J].中华手外科杂志,2021,37(3):219-222.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn311653- 20210222-06800.
[14] 苏丽梅,孙丽华.肘管综合征的神经传导检测分析[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(10):101-103.DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2022.10.034.
[15] 胡玉藏.高频超声用于上肢神经卡压综合征诊断的临床价值分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2019,25(22):3714-3715.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2019.22.017.
[16] 李强,宋辉,张成.带蒂筋膜瓣包裹尺神经的肘管扩大成形术治疗肘管综合征的临床疗效[J].实用手外科杂志,2022,36(4):477-479.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2022. 04.015.
[17] 张磊,王海林,刘旋,等.尺神经松解前置术治疗肘管综合征的临床疗效及预后的影响因素分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2021,30(6):520-524.DOI:10.11659/jjssx.12E020020.
[18] Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS. Ulnar neuropathy with normal electrodiagnosis and abnormal nerve ultrasound[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 91(2):318-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.010.

不同电生理检测方法在诊断肘管综合征中的应用价值

Value of different electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈泽楷衡宝利陈洁. 基于盆底解剖三代电生理技术治疗盆底肌过度紧张患者的临床疗效观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3345-3350.
[2]	薛莹洁赵伯杰. 儿童Miller-Fisher综合征和Guillain-Barré综合征的神经电生理对比分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(12): 1653-1657.
[3]	魏健文, 尹文俊, 陈泽楷, 凌木安, 陈洁, 潘斌. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后电生理技术早期干预恢复控尿功能的临床疗效观察[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(8): 1038-1041.