基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理方案的构建和应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.23.034

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　构建基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理方案并探讨其应用效果。方法　采用便利抽样法，选取广州市第一人民医院泌尿外科神经源性膀胱患者作为研究对象，根据患者首次就诊时间，将2022年7月至2023年1月收治的51例患者纳入对照组，实施常规管理，其中男性26例，女性25例，年龄（56.12±9.20）岁；将2023年2月至2023年7月收治的51例患者纳入观察组，实施基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理，其中男性23例，女性28例，年龄（55.80±7.02）岁。比较两组患者管理前后的心理状态［焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分］、膀胱功能恢复情况（膀胱容量、最大排尿量、残余尿量）。计量资料采用独立样本t检验，计数资料采用χ²检验。结果　管理前，两组患者SAS、SDS评分比较，差异均无统计学意义（P=0.694、0.275）；管理后，观察组SAS评分低于对照组［（19.89±3.51）分比（26.20±3.38）分］（P<0.001），观察组SDS评分低于对照组［（34.86±2.42）分比（47.23±4.59）分］（P<0.001）。管理前，两组患者膀胱功能指标比较，差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；管理后，观察组膀胱容量高于对照组［（371.66±62.67）ml比（344.51±60.35）ml］（P<0.05），观察组最大排尿量高于对照组［（243.37±56.79）ml比（197.48±49.90）ml］（P<0.001），观察组残余尿量低于对照组［（89.69±17.59）ml比（99.55±20.96）ml］（P<0.05）。结论　基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理方案能够改善神经源性膀胱患者负面情绪及膀胱功能。

关键词:

神经源性膀胱, 循证理念, 管理方案, 构建, 临床应用

Abstract:

Objective　To construct an evidence-based neurogenic bladder management protocol and evaluate its application effect. Methods　Patients with neurogenic bladder from Urinary Surgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital were selected by convenience sampling. According to the date of first visit, 51 patients from July 2022 to January 2023 were recruited to the control group, who were given routine management, including 26 males and 25 females, with an age of (56.12±9.20) years old; 51 patients from February 2023 to July 2023 were recruited to the observation group, who were given evidence-based neurogenic bladder management, including 23 males and 28 females, with an age of (55.80±7.02) years old. The psychological status [Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) score] and bladder function recovery (bladder capacity, maximum urine output, and residual urine volume) of the two groups were compared before and after management. Independent sample t test was used for the measurement data and χ² test was used for the count data. Results　Before management, there were no statistically significant differences in the score of SAS or SDS between the two groups (P=0.694 and 0.275). After management, the SAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(19.89±3.51) points vs. (26.20±3.38) points] (P<0.001), and the SDS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(34.86±2.42) points vs. (47.23±4.59) points] (P<0.001). Before management, there were no statistically significant differences in the bladder function indexes between the two groups (all P>0.05). After management, the bladder capacity of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [(371.66±62.67) ml vs. (344.51±60.35) ml] (P<0.05), the maximum urine output of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [(243.37±56.79) ml vs. (197.48±49.90) ml] (P<0.001), and the residual urine volume of the observation group was lower than that of the control group [(89.69±17.59) ml vs. (99.55±20.96) ml] (P<0.05). Conclusion　Evidence-based neurogenic bladder management can improve the negative emotions and bladder function in patients with neurogenic bladder.

Key words:

Neurogenic bladder, Evidence-based concept, Management program, Construction, Clinical application

邱霞资青兰冯小红彭三王洁琼谢克基.

基于循证的神经源性膀胱管理方案的构建和应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3474-3478.

Qiu Xia, Zi Qinglan, Feng Xiaohong, Peng San, Wang Jieqiong, Xie Keji.

Construction and application of evidence-based neurogenic bladder management protocol [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(23): 3474-3478.

参考文献

[1] 胡英杰,陈晓敏,范春花,等.神经源性膀胱上尿路损害风险管理方案的构建[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(2):18-21.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.02.018.
[2] 王维,张沛.系统性康复护理对脊柱脊髓损伤伴神经源性膀胱功能障碍的影响[J].贵州医药,2023,47(8):1322-1323.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2023.08.092.
[3] 刘晶莲,王芳,原姗姗.基于循证医学的临床护理路径对肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者营养状况及预后的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(16):122-125.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202316031.
[4] 龙秀印,马昊杰.间歇导尿和膀胱管理方案在脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者中的应用效果分析[J].中国农村卫生,2019,11(20):41-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674- 361X.2019.20.050.
[5] 甘泉,朱伟珍,卢丽丽.中西医结合膀胱管理方案对脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱的改善作用[J].新中医,2017,49(2):171-173.DOI:10.13457/j.cnki.jncm.2017.02.061.
[6] 中国康复医学会康复护理专业委员会.神经源性膀胱护理指南(2011年版)(二)[J].中华护理杂志,2011,46(2):210-216.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2011.02.043.
[7] 张莉莉,全玮琳.Crede手法及清洁间歇导尿对宫颈癌术后尿潴留患者自主排尿功能恢复的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2021,28(6):737-740.DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2021.06.25.
[8] 刘丹,谢婷婷.基于微信主导的延续性康复干预模式在前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁患者中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(17):181-184.
[9] 马鑫鑫,潘雪,朱紫萌.目标控制下的康复训练方案在脊髓损伤神经源性膀胱患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(15):152-154.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2023. 15.048.
[10] 王心菀,王峥,喻晓芬.综合康复结合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱患者的临床效果观察[J].药物流行病学杂志,2023,32(7):730-736.DOI:10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698. 202307002.
[11] 龚德,王颖敏,钟丽容,等.神经源性膀胱功能障碍评估与管理相关指南的整合研究[J].护理学报,2021,28(3):27-33.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.03.027.
[12] 顾力.膀胱管理方案在脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱患者康复中的应用效果分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2016,34(S2):126.DOI:10.13704/j.cnki.jyyx.2016.s2.112.
[13] Thomas S, Bradley J, Cole G, et al. The neurogenic bladder: developing a consensus bladder and bowel management pathway for people with MS[J]. Br J Nurs, 2022, 31(21):1088-1095. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.21.1088.
[14] 陈烨,邢唯杰,杨靖华,等.卒中后神经源性膀胱功能康复循证护理实践效果分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(19):2566-2571.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20211215- 05642.
[15] 李缘媛.基于神经源性膀胱护理指南的内容分析及循证实践研究[D].兰州大学,2023.
[16] 张蕾.膀胱管理方案在脊髓损伤后神经源性膀胱患者康复中的应用效果探讨[J/CD].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(28):5390,5392.DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242. 2017. 28.030.
[17] Przydacz M, Denys P, Corcos J. What do we know about neurogenic bladder prevalence and management in developing countries and emerging regions of the world? [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2017, 60(5):341-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.008.
[18] Bagińska J, Korzeniecka-Kozerska A. Non-invasive markers in the management of pediatric neurogenic bladder over the last two decades - a review[J]. Adv Med Sci, 2021, 66(1):162-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2021. 02.001.
[19] 都婧,杨永萍,柳尧花,等.脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱功能障碍经直肠超声膀胱血流动力学分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(13):1933-1937.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007- 1245.2021.13.007.
[20] 叶丽,黄厚强,郭声敏,等.脑卒中后神经源性膀胱管理的最佳证据总结[J].护理学报,2021,28(10):40-44.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.10.040.