加速康复外科在耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的应用研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.23.017

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (23): 3399-3402.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.23.017

加速康复外科在耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的应用研究

熊辉强¹ 潘鸿桂¹ 曹小青¹ 甘文鹉²

¹丰城市人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科，丰城　331100；²丰城市人民医院麻醉科，丰城　331100

收稿日期:2023-03-31 出版日期:2023-12-01 发布日期:2024-01-03
基金资助:
江西省卫生健康委普通科技计划项目（202140839）

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of endoscopic myringoplasty

Xiong Huiqiang¹, Pan Honggui¹, Cao Xiaoqing¹, Gan Wenwu²

¹Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Fengcheng People's Hospital, Fengcheng 331100, China; ²Department of Anesthesiology, Fengcheng People's Hospital, Fengcheng 331100, China

Received:2023-03-31 Online:2023-12-01 Published:2024-01-03
Supported by:
General Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission (202140839)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨加速康复外科（ERAS）在耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的有效性和安全性。方法　本文为随机对照试验。前瞻性选取2021年1月至2022年6月丰城市人民医院收治并进行耳内镜下鼓膜修补术的40例慢性化脓性中耳炎静止期患者作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法将其分为ERAS组（20例）和对照组（20例）。ERAS组男4例、女16例，年龄（45.7±11.6）岁，采用ERAS模式进行围手术期管理；对照组男5例、女15例，年龄（46.5±12.4）岁，采用传统的围手术期管理。对比两组患者术前焦虑情况及术后舒适度、疼痛、不良反应、住院时间、住院费用。采用t检验、χ²检验。结果　ERAS组患者术前焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分为（27.31±1.54）分，低于对照组的（34.82±5.13）分，差异有统计学意义（t=6.270，P<0.001）。术后1 d、2 d，ERAS组患者Kolcaba的舒适状况量表（GCQ）评分均高于对照组［（89.53±7.85）分比（83.24±7.21）分、（87.31±7.67）分比（81.03±8.45）分］，视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分均低于对照组［（1.73±1.12）分比（3.00±1.31）分、（1.59±1.06）分比（2.78±1.27）分］，差异均有统计学意义（t=2.639、2.461、3.295、3.217，均P<0.05）。两组患者住院时间及住院费用比较，差异均无统计学意义（t=0.914、1.464，均P>0.05）。两组患者术后耳部切口无出血，患者无眩晕、恶心、呕吐及误吸等不良事件发生。结论　ERAS用于耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的效果确切，能缓解患者术前焦虑情绪，减轻患者术后疼痛，提高患者术后舒适度。

关键词:

加速康复外科, 耳内镜, 鼓膜修补术, 围手术期管理

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of endoscopic myringoplasty. Methods　This was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media stationary phase who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty in Fengcheng People's Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 were prospectively selected as the study objects, and were divided into a ERAS group (20 cases) and a control group (20 cases) by the random number table method. In the ERAS group, there were 4 males and 16 females, aged (45.7±11.6) years, and the perioperative management was performed using ERAS model. In the control group, 5 males and 15 females, aged (46.5±12.4) years, were treated with traditional perioperative management. The preoperative anxiety, postoperative comfort, pain, adverse reactions, length of stay, and hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups. t test and χ² test were used. Results　The preoperative Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score of the ERAS group was (27.31±1.54) points, which was lower than that of the control group [(34.82±5.13) points], with a statistically significant difference (t=6.270, P<0.001). On day 1 and day 2 after surgery, the Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) score of the ERAS group was higher than that of the control group [(89.53±7.85) points vs. (83.24±7.21) points, (87.31±7.67) points vs. (81.03±8.45) points], but the VAS score was lower than that of the control group [(1.73±1.12) points vs. (3.00±1.31) points, (1.59±1.06) points vs. (2.78±1.27) points], with statistically significant differences (t=2.639, 2.461, 3.295, and 3.217, all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the length of stay or hospitalization cost between the two groups (t=0.914 and 1.464, both P>0.05). There was no bleeding in the ear incision, and no adverse events such as vertigo, nausea, vomiting, or aspiration occurred in the two groups. Conclusion　ERAS has definite effects in the perioperative period of endoscopic myringoplasty, which can relieve the preoperative anxiety, reduce the postoperative pain, and improve the postoperative comfort.

Key words:

Enhanced recovery after surgery, Otoscope, Myringoplasty, Perioperative management

熊辉强潘鸿桂曹小青甘文鹉.

加速康复外科在耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的应用研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3399-3402.

Xiong Huiqiang, Pan Honggui, Cao Xiaoqing, Gan Wenwu.

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of endoscopic myringoplasty [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(23): 3399-3402.

参考文献

[1] 戴俨若,杨海弟,郑亿庆. 耳内镜下同期双侧鼓室成形术疗效观察[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2018,32(16):1271-1274.DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.16.014.
[2] 张宇,宋西成. 多学科联合在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科围手术期加速康复外科中的应用[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2021,56(3):312-317.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330- 20200819-00681.
[3] Bannister M, Ah-See KW. Enhanced recovery programmes in head and neck surgery: systematic review[J].J Laryngol Otol,2015,129(5):416-420.DOI:10.1017/S0022215115000936.
[4] Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme[J].Br J Surg,1999,86(2):227-230.DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x.
[5] 卢镇章,陶晶,刘日钊,等. 加速康复外科在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者同期多平面手术围手术期的应用价值研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2021,28(5):305-309.DOI:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2021.05.011.
[6] Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J].Am J Surg,2002,183(6):630-641.DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.
[7] 金希施,林莉莉,虞海峰,等. 加速康复外科在腹腔镜肾上腺切除围手术期中的临床应用经验[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2021,27(5):40-45.DOI:10.12235/E20210152.
[8] Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 1)[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2018,219(6):523.e1-523.e15.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015.
[9] 杨钦泰,孔维封,吴喜福. 加速康复外科理念及其在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中的应用[J]. 国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2018,42(4):237-241.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106. 2018.04.011.
[10] Scott NB, McDonald D, Campbell J, et al. The use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles in Scottish orthopaedic units--an implementation and follow-up at 1 year, 2010-2011: a report from the musculoskeletal audit, Scotland[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133(1):117-124.DOI:10.1007/s00402-012- 1619-z.
[11] 文政伟,张冠荣,吴粤,等. 加速康复外科诊疗模式实践的效果及影响因素[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(11):1499-1503.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.11.026.
[12] 熊辉强,徐义香,夏良勇,等. 耳内镜下自体不同修复材料在鼓膜修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 江西医药,2020,55(8):1115-1117.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2020.08.046.
[13] 谭静芊,王玮豪,陈愈彬,等. 加速康复外科在耳内镜下鼓室成形术围手术期应用的临床研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2019,26(7):361-363.DOI:10.16066/j.1672-7002.2019. 07.006.
[14] Kehlet H, Joshi GP. Enhanced recovery after surgery: current controversies and concerns[J].Anesth Analg,2017,125(6):2154-2155.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002231.
[15] 朱跃新,胡春波,陈恺铮,等. 显微镜和耳内镜下鼓膜修补术对麻醉管理和患者早期恢复的影响[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2019,19(5):342-344,348.DOI:10.14166/j.issn.1671- 2420.2019.05.013.
[16] 徐建慧,李欣,寸晶晶,等.加速康复外科在鼻中隔偏曲矫正术围手术期的应用效果[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2021,35(1):21-24. DOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2020.111.
[17] 陈伟东,陈丹,张玉龙,等. ERAS管理与中耳手术患者术后听力恢复的相关性[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2021,19(4):302-305.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2021. 04.017.

加速康复外科在耳内镜下鼓膜修补术围手术期的应用研究

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of endoscopic myringoplasty

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics