超声与MSCT在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值对比

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.15.017

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (15): 2144-2148.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.15.017

超声与MSCT在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值对比

彭鸿运¹ 黄育斌² 梁耀园¹ 廖婉琦¹

¹广东省妇幼保健院超声科，广州　510010；²广东省妇幼保健院放射科，广州　510010

收稿日期:2023-04-04 出版日期:2023-08-01 发布日期:2023-08-28
通讯作者: 彭鸿运，Email：52127865@qq.com

Comparison of the diagnostic significance of ultrasound and MSCT in children with digestive tract duplication

Peng Hongyun¹, Huang Yubin², Liang Yaoyuan¹, Liao Wanqi¹

¹Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, China; ²Department of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, China

Received:2023-04-04 Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-28
Contact: Peng Hongyun, Email: 52127865@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　分析超声与多层螺旋CT（MSCT）在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值差异。方法　回顾性分析广东省妇幼保健院在2014年1月至2022年11月期间收治的已通过手术病理证实为消化道重复畸形42例患儿的临床资料，其中男性26例，女性16例，年龄（3.65±2.24）岁。所有患儿术前均行超声与MSCT检查，分析超声及MSCT两种检查方法的影像表现特点，以手术病理结果为金标准作对比，比较两种检查方法的诊断价值。使用χ²检验和校正χ²检验。结果　42例消化道重复畸形中，位于食道2例，空肠5例，回肠20例，回盲部8例，结直肠1例，胃4例，十二指肠2例；按类型分，囊肿型37例，管状型5例。与手术病理结果对照，超声诊断符合28例（诊断符合率66.7%），误诊9例（误诊率21.4%），漏诊5例（漏诊率11.9%）；MSCT诊断符合34例（诊断符合率80.9%），误诊6例（误诊率14.3%），漏诊2例（漏诊率4.8%）；超声与MSCT对肠重复畸形的总体的诊断符合率、误诊率及漏诊率差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论　超声与MSCT均能够高效诊断小儿消化道重复畸形，MSCT总体诊断符合率略高于超声检查，误诊率及漏诊率相对较低，但超声有操作简便、无辐射及可实时动态观察的优势，可作为检查首选，两者综合应用可为临床确定病灶性质类型、具体部位及制定治疗方案提供有力参考。

关键词:

超声, 多层螺旋CT, 消化道重复畸形, 小儿

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the difference in the diagnostic significance of ultrasound and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in children with digestive tract duplication. Methods　The clinical data of 42 children confirmed as digestive tract duplication by surgery and pathology in Guangdong Women and Children Hospital from January 2014 to November 2022 were analyzed retrospectively, including 26 males and 16 females, aged (3.65±2.24) years. All the children were given ultrasound and MSCT examination prior to the surgery. The imaging characteristics of ultrasound and MSCT were analyzed, and the diagnostic significance of the two methods was compared with surgical pathology results as the gold standard. χ² test and corrected χ² test were used. Results　Of the 42 cases, 2 were located in the esophagus, 5 in the jejunum, 20 in the ileum, 8 in the ileocecal region, 1 in the colorectum, 4 in the stomach, and 2 in the duodenum. There were 37 cyst-type cases and 5 tubular-type cases. Compared with the results of surgical pathology, 28 cases were diagnosed met (diagnostic coincidence rate of 66.7%), 9 cases were misdiagnosed (misdiagnosis rate of 21.4%), and 5 cases were missed (missed diagnosis rate of 11.9%) by ultrasound; 34 cases were diagnosed met (diagnostic coincidence rate of 80.9%), 6 cases were misdiagnosed (misdiagnosis rate of 14.3%), and 2 cases were missed (missed diagnosis rate of 4.8%) by MSCT; there were no statistically significant differences in the overall diagnostic coincidence rate, misdiagnosis rate, and missed diagnosis rate between ultrasound and MSCT (all P>0.05). Conclusions　Both ultrasound and MSCT can effectively diagnose digestive tract duplication in children. The overall diagnosis coincidence rate of MSCT is slightly higher than that of ultrasound, and the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate are relatively low. However, ultrasound has the advantage of being simple to operate, radiation-free, and real-time dynamic observation, so it can be preferred. The combined application of both methods can provide a powerful reference for clinical determination of the nature and type of the lesion, its specific location, and the formulation of treatment plans.

Key words:

Ultrasound, Multi-slice spiral CT, Digestive tract duplication, Children

彭鸿运黄育斌梁耀园廖婉琦.

超声与MSCT在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值对比 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(15): 2144-2148.

Peng Hongyun, Huang Yubin, Liang Yaoyuan, Liao Wanqi.

Comparison of the diagnostic significance of ultrasound and MSCT in children with digestive tract duplication [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(15): 2144-2148.

参考文献

[1] Kim SH, Cho YH, Kim HY. Alimentary tract duplication in pediatric patients: its distinct clinical features and managements[J]. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr, 2020, 23(5):423-429. DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.5.423.
[2] Patiño Mayer J, Bettolli M. Alimentary tract duplications in newborns and children: diagnostic aspects and the role of laparoscopic treatment[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(39):14263-14271. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14263.
[3] Jeziorczak PM, Warner BW. Enteric duplication[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2018, 31(2):127-131. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1609028.
[4] 陈慧敏,霍亚玲,康瑾,等.高频超声检查对小儿消化道重复畸形的诊断价值[J].实用医学影像杂志,2020,21(6):647-649. DOI:10.16106/j.cnki.cn14-1281/r.2020.06.030.
[5] 焦慧,张丽娟,王刚,等.小儿消化道重复畸形的临床及影像学特征分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2020,30(2):242-245.
[6] Rasool N, Safdar CA, Ahmad A, et al. Enteric duplication in children: clinical presentation and outcome[J]. Singapore Med J, 2013, 54(6):343-346. DOI: 10.11622/smedj. 2013129.
[7] 胡烈榛,夏焙,于红奎,等.小儿消化道重复畸形超声诊断价值[J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(10):2196-2201. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011. 10.021.
[8] 徐珂,崔可飞.超声对婴幼儿颈段食管重复畸形的诊断及介入治疗价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2015,23(3):173-174. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2015.03.004.
[9] 王晓曼,贾立群,杨蕊.超声在儿童消化道重复畸形诊断中的应用[J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(5):1092-1098. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011. 05.028.
[10] Di Serafino M, Mercogliano C, Vallone G. Ultrasound evaluation of the enteric duplication cyst: the gut signature[J]. J Ultrasound, 2015, 19(2):131-133. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-015-0188-8.
[11] Cheng LS, Courtier J, MacKenzie TC. Anal duplication in a one-year-old girl[J]. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep, 2013, 1(10):373-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsc.2013.10.002.
[12] 周俊霖,裴莉,苗静,等.小儿消化道重复畸形的MSCT诊断[J].南昌大学学报(医学版),2013,53(10):36-40.
[13] 江肖松,吴松鑫,黄育斌,等.小儿肠重复畸形的多层螺旋CT表现与临床[J].医学影像学杂志,2018,28(7):1160-1163.
[14] 胡俊,胡克非,李庚武,等.小儿美克尔憩室及其合并症的CT表现[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(4):358-361. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2011.04.008.

超声与MSCT在小儿消化道重复畸形中的诊断价值对比

Comparison of the diagnostic significance of ultrasound and MSCT in children with digestive tract duplication

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	汪晓云李心怡赵红阳. 微信群延续护理+同伴教育在小儿先天性马蹄足门诊治疗中的应用 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(2): 275-.
[2]	陈倩茜刘舒南. 血清PCT与NLR联合早期预警评分在小儿重症肺炎预后评估中的价值 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(10): 1417-1420.
[3]	王思琦陈熳妮林晓红林钰滢刘爱华熊述清. 中药贴敷配合推拿疗法治疗小儿便秘的疗效及安全性的meta分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(1): 22-.
[4]	陈斌, 冷志欣, 田红岸. 多层螺旋CT扫描MPR和VR重建在细微及隐匿性骨折中的应用对比[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(7): 950-953.
[5]	梁雁冰, 陈金兰, 苏郑明. 髓质海绵肾的诊断研究进展[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(6): 759-761.
[6]	张武, 李贻霞, 吴丽灵, 蒙丽婵, 霍保善, 詹锋, 杨凯, 胡旭东. 磷酸肌酸钠对体外循环下房室间隔缺损修补术患儿心肌能量代谢和心肺功能的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(5): 656-662.
[7]	孙丽芳. 金振口服液联合抗生素对小儿支原体肺炎的临床治疗效果[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(20): 2853-2857.
[8]	王晓平, 严小强. 超声检查对小儿阑尾炎的诊断和临床分型的应用价值[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(2): 241-243.
[9]	刘月梅汤昱张磊. 多模式肺康复计划对小儿哮喘中远期疗效的随机对照及纵向随访观察研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(16): 2303-2306.
[10]	阿力木江•阿布来孜, 王海亮, 艾克拜尔江•买买提, 秦世彪, 李思思, 郭凯凯, 加素尔•巴吐尔. 小儿下尿路结石的诊治分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2022, 28(12): 1711-1714.
[11]	杨晓娟, 徐蕾, 王丽华. 中医推拿对小儿支气管哮喘患者PEF以及C-ACT评分的影响分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2021, 27(6): 844-847.