植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗下颌角骨折患者的效果分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.20.010

国际医药卫生导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (20): 3398-3402.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.20.010

植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗下颌角骨折患者的效果分析

周谦¹ 拓瑞¹ 呼延静² 田莹³

¹延安大学附属医院口腔颌面外科，延安　716000；²延安大学附属医院麻醉科，延安　716000；³延安大学附属医院牙周病科，延安　716000

收稿日期:2024-05-31 出版日期:2024-10-01 发布日期:2024-10-18
通讯作者: 拓瑞，Email：tarui091l@163.com
基金资助:
陕西省卫生健康科研项目（2022B008）

Effect of implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation on patients with mandibular angle fracture

Zhou Qian¹, Ta Rui¹, Hu Yanjing², Tian Ying³

¹Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China; ²Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China; ³Department of Periodontology, Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China

Received:2024-05-31 Online:2024-10-01 Published:2024-10-18
Contact: Ta Rui, Email: tarui091l@163.com
Supported by:
Health Research Project of Shaanxi Province (2022B008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定对下颌角骨折患者疼痛、咀嚼和张口受限的影响。方法　本研究为随机对照试验。选取2019年9月至2023年9月延安大学附属医院收治的下颌角骨折患者108例，使用随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组，每组54例。观察组男31例，女23例；年龄（46.21±5.03）岁，骨折部位：左侧26例，右侧28例，接受植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗；对照组男33例，女21例；年龄（45.79±6.18）岁，骨折部位：左侧29例，右侧25例，接受牙弓夹板颌间牵引外固定联合钛板内固定治疗。比较两组手术前后视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、咀嚼功能、张口度、下颌活动度变化，并评估两组术后3个月时愈合情况。采用χ²检验、秩和检验、t检验。结果　术后1个月、3个月，两组VAS评分均低于术前，且观察组均低于对照组［（2.03±0.86）分比（2.49±0.71）分、（0.22±0.05）分比（0.29±0.07）分］（t=3.031、5.980，均P<0.05）；两组咀嚼功能评分均高于术前，且观察组均高于对照组［（5.76±1.13）分比（5.02±1.07）分、（8.65±0.67）分比（8.23±0.59）分］（t=3.494、3.457，均P<0.05）；两组张口度、下颌前后活动度均大于术前，且观察组均大于对照组（均P<0.05）。观察组一期愈合29例、二期愈合23例、三期愈合2例，对照组一期愈合22例、二期愈合21例、三期愈合11例，差异有统计学意义（Z=3.971，P=0.046）。结论　植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗下颌角骨折效果显著，可以减轻患者疼痛，改善咀嚼功能和张口受限程度，促进骨折愈合。

关键词:

下颌角骨折, 植入式钛钉颌间牵引, 钛板内固定, 疼痛, 咀嚼, 张口受限

Abstract:

Objective　To investigate the effects of implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation on pain, mastication, and limitation of mouth opening in patients with mandibular angle fracture. Methods　This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 108 patients with mandibular angle fracture admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University from September 2019 to September 2023 were enrolled in this study and were divided into an observation group and a control group using the random number table method, with 54 cases in each group. In the observation group, there were 31 males and 23 females, aged (46.21±5.03) years, and the fracture site was on the left side in 26 cases and on the right side in 28 cases. In the control group, there were 33 males and 21 females, aged (45.79±6.18) years, and the fracture site was on the left side in 29 cases and on the right side in 25 cases. The observation group received implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation, and the control group received arch splint intermaxillary traction external fixation combined with titanium plate internal fixation. The changes of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, masticatory function, mouth opening degree, and mandibular mobility before and after surgery were compared between the two groups, and the healing status of the two groups at 3 months after surgery was evaluated. χ² test, rank sum test, and t test were used. Results　At 1 month and 3 months after surgery, the VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before surgery, and those of the observation group were lower than those of the control group [(2.03±0.86) points vs. (2.49±0.71) points, (0.22±0.05) points vs. (0.29±0.07) points] (t=3.031 and 5.980, both P<0.05). At 1 month and 3 months after surgery, the masticatory function scores of the two groups were higher than those before surgery, and those of the observation group were higher than those of the control group [(5.76±1.13) points vs. (5.02±1.07) points, (8.65±0.67) points vs. (8.23±0.59) points] (t=3.494 and 3.457, both P<0.05). At 1 month and 3 months after surgery, the mouth opening and mandibular anterior-to-posterior motion of the two groups were higher than those before surgery, and those of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). In the observation group, there were 29 cases of first stage healing, 23 cases of second stage healing, and 2 cases of third stage healing; in the control group, there were 22 cases of first stage healing, 21 cases of second stage healing, and 11 cases of third stage healing; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z=3.971, P=0.046). Conclusion　Implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation helps to improve the pain, mastication, and limitation of mouth opening in patients with mandibular angle fracture, and promote the fracture healing and recovery.

Key words:

Mandibular angle fracture, Implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction, Titanium plate internal fixation, Pain, Mastication, , Limitation of mouth opening

周谦拓瑞呼延静田莹.

植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗下颌角骨折患者的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(20): 3398-3402.

Zhou Qian, Ta Rui, Hu Yanjing, Tian Ying.

Effect of implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation on patients with mandibular angle fracture [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(20): 3398-3402.

参考文献

[1] 邢园,谭聪明. 微型钛板与生物可吸收板在下颌骨骨折切复内固定术中的应力研究[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(8):1220-1221. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2022.08.025.
[2] 何冬梅,杨驰. 下颌骨髁突骨折的诊治方案:基于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院颞下颌关节中心的经验[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版),2022,42(6):695-701. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.06.001.
[3] Daud R, Wenzhao X, Ibrahim I, et al. Effect of chewing and cutting condition for V-shape three-dimensional titanium miniplate for fixation of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs)[J]. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2020, 11(4):625-631. DOI:10.1108/IJSI-12-2019-0140.
[4] Gamit M, Patel Y, Sood R, et al. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2024, 28(2):645-652. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-023-01182-2.
[5] 李立峰,史婧怡,屠军波,等. 下颌神经管在下颌角区的位置特征及其在下颌角骨折微创治疗中的意义[J]. 山西医科大学学报,2019,50(7):1025-1028. DOI:10.13753/j.issn.1007-6611.2019.07.030.
[6] Pavithra SK, Vivek N, Saravanan C, et al. Comparison of conventional versus right angled fixation technique in management of mandibular angle fractures - a prospective randomized clinical study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 81(8):1001-1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.04.005.
[7] 许梅,苑学微,李静,等. 钛板内固定联合植入式钛钉颌间牵引外固定治疗下颌角骨折患者效果观察[J]. 临床误诊误治,2023,36(2):108-112. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429. 2023.02.023.
[8] Ganguly A, Mittal G, Garg R. Comparison between 3D delta plate and conventional miniplate in treatment of condylar fracture: a randomised clinical trial[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2021, 49(11):1026-1034. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.026.
[9] 吴章,李泽毓,赵贵然,等. 新西兰兔下颌骨牵引成骨早期拆除牵引装置植入钛钉对新骨形成的影响[J]. 解剖学杂志,2020,43(1):43-46. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2020. 01.010.
[10] 郭梁影,孟献斌,吴志刚.关节盘复位锚固术在下颌骨髁突囊内骨折伴关节盘移位治疗中的应用研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(5):587-591.
[11] 刘军,曾令烽,潘建科,等.中医骨伤科循证临床实践指南制定共性问题的专家共识[J].中华中医药杂志,2018,33(8):3228-3232.
[12] 李仕海,陈莺,丘培利,等. 下牙槽神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在下颌骨骨折固定术中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(7):583-586. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2019. 07.003.
[13] 王建忠,谷永成,蔡晓芳,等. 下颌骨骨折内固定术临床疗效及对颞下颌关节功能的影响[J]. 西南国防医药,2016,26(8):904-906. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2016.08.028.
[14] 许梅,冯莹,李娜,等. 可吸收微型聚合物内固定在治疗下颌骨骨折中的效果评价[J]. 河北医药,2021,43(24):3773-3775,3779. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2021. 24.023.
[15] Daud R, Wenzhao X, Ibrahim I, et al. Effect of chewing and cutting condition for V-shape three-dimensional titanium miniplate for fixation of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs)[J].International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2020, 11(4):625-631.DOI:10.1108/IJSI-12-2019-0140.
[16] 洪虓,展昭均,陈永锋,等. 牙支持式导板联合导航技术在下颌骨骨折治疗中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学,2023,21(9):1487-1490,1527. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152. 003152.
[17] 谢柳琴,黄志才,王光素,等. 甲状旁腺激素干预兔下颌骨髁突高位骨折游离复位后的软骨愈合[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2020,24(32):5114-5121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344. 2858.
[18] 王培,周彪,马永平. 聚左旋丙交酯板内固定联合颌间牵引钉外固定治疗颌骨骨折效果观察及对炎性因子、颞颌关节功能的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治,2023,36(2):113-117. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2023.02.024.
[19] 洪虓,展昭均,陈永锋,等.牙支持式导板联合导航技术在下颌骨骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华全科医学, 2023, 21(9):1487-1490.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003152.
[20] 王健,俞晓佳. 钛钉颌间牵引固定配合弹力帽辅助固定法治疗下颌骨骨折的临床研究[J]. 海军医学杂志,2020,41(2):183-185,224.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2020.02.021.
[21] 汪保,胡利兵,彭海燕,等. 植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合微型钛板内固定治疗颌骨骨折的疗效观察[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2019,21(5):391-392. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237. 2019.05.019.
[22] 蒋卫东,李文慧,许刚,等. 微创钛板联合植入式钛钉对颌骨骨折患者颌骨功能、术后感染的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床,2019,16(19):2824-2827. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455. 2019.19.021.
[23] 刘效文,柳兆刚,田宏伟,等. 钛钉颌间固定结合弹力帽辅助固定法与钛板内固定联合钛钉颌间牵引法在下颌骨骨折治疗中的临床应用比较[J]. 河北医学,2023,29(5):785-789. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2023.05.017.
[24] 牛谦云,孟翔祥,吴龑,等. 钛钉颌间牵引固定术联合弹力帽辅助固定法治疗下颌骨骨折患者的效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2022,34(4):56-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2022. 04.018.
[25] 王健,俞晓佳.钛钉颌间牵引固定配合弹力帽辅助固定法治疗下颌骨骨折的临床研究[J].海军医学杂志, 2020, 41(2):183-224. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2020.02.021.
[26] 汪保,胡利兵,彭海燕,等.植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合微型钛板内固定治疗颌骨骨折的疗效观察[J].创伤外科杂志, 2019, 21(5):391-392. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237. 2019.05.019.
[27] 佟爽,郭澍,熊伟,等. 牵引钉与牙弓夹板在颌骨骨折坚固内固定治疗中应用效果的比较[J]. 中国医科大学学报,2021,50(9):851-855. DOI:10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2021. 09.018.
[28] 常博杰,高丽荣. 植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合微型钛板内固定在颌骨骨折治疗中的效果[J]. 微创医学,2021,16(5):649-651,664. DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2021.05.13.
[29] 肖胜杰. 颌间牵引钉在颌骨骨折患者微型钛板内固定中的应用价值[J]. 河南医学研究,2020,29(4):628-630. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2020.04.024.

植入式钛钉颌间牵引联合钛板内固定治疗下颌角骨折患者的效果分析

Effect of implantable titanium nail intermaxillary traction combined with titanium plate internal fixation on patients with mandibular angle fracture

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	卢健王亚军宋杰. 一次性根管治疗与多次法根管治疗在牙体牙髓病患者中的疗效观察 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1111-1116.
[2]	胡伟袁文霞熊文佳刘焕兵. 新癀片联合复方桐叶烧伤油治疗急性痛风性关节炎患者的疗效分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(7): 1152-1156.
[3]	宋杰张光炜卢健. 复方盐酸阿替卡因在儿童牙体牙髓疾病治疗中的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(6): 1009-1012.
[4]	欧阳月仙吴海蓉彭姣周立德. 自体富血小板血浆在慢性难愈合创面治疗中的效果分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(6): 1013-1017.
[5]	刘磊吕树振刘竣王中英刘学淼. 腕关节镜辅助Wristore外固定架治疗Barton骨折患者的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(3): 439-443.
[6]	刘彦会程亚栋陈东宁. 系统性疼痛护理在下胫腓联合损伤术后患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(3): 448-452.
[7]	高建东孙富德. 复方倍他米松腔内注射联合体外冲击波治疗疼痛性肩关节挛缩症的效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(21): 3671-3675.
[8]	张琳高艾玲何祥一. 白芍总苷胶囊联合益生菌芦荟发酵凝胶治疗复发性阿弗他溃疡的疗效分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(21): 3675-3679.
[9]	戴丽芳董小琼厉晨洁王小梅. 第二产程侧卧位分娩对初产妇分娩结局及盆底功能的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(20): 3453-3457.
[10]	张晔. 关节镜下清理术联合截骨术治疗内侧间室膝骨关节炎的疗效研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(2): 214-218.
[11]	徐健莹刘宇陈莉佳关丽娟. 大面积隔物灸改善腰痛患者疼痛及腰椎功能的meta分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(18): 3051-3057.
[12]	郭超闫书贤李淑华杨兴强邢东亮. 输尿管软镜碎石取石术对男性肾结石患者肾功能、疼痛应激的影响 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(18): 3098-3102.
[13]	甘明静吴爱真邱茜茜余巧龙陈昕. 外周血TNF-α/NF-κB/NEAT1信号通路与颞下颌关节紊乱患者慢性疼痛的关系 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(17): 2822-2827.
[14]	伍凌子赖晶马丹莹王玮李莉黄芳. 疲劳在心脏外科手术后患者疼痛与重返工作自我效能中的中介效应分析 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(16): 2777-2782.
[15]	刘寿珍夏恩琴李清娜. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后基于疼痛管理的康复护理效果评估 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(16): 2801-2805.