Influencing factors of effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling for patients with open eyeball injury

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.23.015

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To analyze the influencing factors of the effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in the treatment of patients with open eyeball injury. Methods　A total of 167 patients with open eyeball injury treated at Department of Ophthalmology, Lianyungang First People's Hospital from January 2020 to July 2023 were selected as the study objects, including 176 males and 38 females. They were 25-59 (42.04±8.10) years old. All the patients underwent vitrectomy and scleral buckling surgery, and were divided into an effective treatment group and an ineffective treatment group based on the treatment effect. χ² test and t test were used for the statistical analysis. Ｍultivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in the treatment of the patients with open eyeball injury. Results　Among the 167 patients, 106 were effectively treated, with an effective rate of 63.47% (106/167). They were included in the treatment effective group. The rest 61 patients were ineffective, with an ineffective rate of 36.53% (61/167). They were included in the treatment ineffective group. The proportion of preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <0.1, the proportion of injury zone Ⅲ, the proportion of injury type of intraocular foreign bodies, and the incidence rate of endophthalmitis in the treatment ineffective group were higher than those in the effective treatment group [68.85% (42/61) vs. 49.06% (52/106), 26.23% (16/61) vs. 12.26% (13/106), 52.46% (32/61) vs. 33.02% (35/106), and 54.10% (33/61) vs. 33.96% (36/106); the proportion of surgery timing between 7-14 d in the treatment ineffective group was lower than that in the treatment effective group [77.05% (47/61) vs. 91.51% (97/106)]; the length of the wound in the treatment ineffective group was longer than that in the treatment effective group [(4.21±0.42) mm vs. (3.96±0.36) mm]; there were statistical differences (χ²=6.17, 6.92, 7.02, 6.48, and 6.83; t=4.06; all P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative BCVA <0.1 (OR=2.174, 95%CI 1.012-4.672), wound length (OR=5.224, 95%CI 1.936-14.100), injury zone Ⅲ (OR=4.064, 95%CI 1.517-10.884), injury type of intraocular foreign bodies (OR=3.236, 95%CI 1.425-7.350), and endophthalmitis (OR=2.879, 95%CI 1.346-6.161) were the risk factors for the effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in the treatment of the patients with open globe injury; the surgery timing between 7-14 d (OR=0.225, 95%CI 0.064-0.788) was a protective factor for the effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in the treatment of the patients with open eyeball injury (all P<0.05). Conclusion　Preoperative BCVA, wound length, injury zone, injury type, endophthalmitis, and surgery timing are the influencing factors for the effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling in the treatment of patients with open eyeball injury.

Key words:

Vitrectomy, Scleral buckling surgery, Open eyeball injury, Influencing factors

摘要：

目的　分析玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗开放性眼外伤效果的影响因素。方法　选取连云港市第一人民医院眼科2020年1月至2023年7月收治的167例开放性眼外伤患者进行前瞻性研究。其中，男129例，女38例，年龄25～59（42.04±8.10）岁。所有患者均行玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗，根据治疗效果将其分为治疗有效组和治疗无效组。统计学方法采用χ²检验、t检验，采用多因素logistic回归分析玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗开放性眼外伤效果的影响因素。结果　167例开放性眼外伤患者中106例治疗有效［63.47%（106/167）］，纳入治疗有效组，61例治疗无效［36.53%（61/167）］，纳入治疗无效组。治疗无效组术前最佳矫正视力（BCVA）<0.1、损伤区域Ⅲ区、损伤类型眼内异物、合并眼内炎占比均高于治疗有效组［68.85%（42/61）比49.06%（52/106）、26.23%（16/61）比12.26%（13/106）、52.46%（32/61）比33.02%（35/106）、54.10%（33/61）比33.96%（36/106）］，手术时机7～14 d占比低于治疗有效组［77.05%（47/61）比91.51%（97/106）］，伤口长度长于治疗有效组［（4.21±0.42）mm比（3.96±0.36）mm］，差异均有统计学意义（χ²=6.17、6.92、7.02、6.48、6.83，t=4.06；均P<0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析显示，术前BCVA<0.1［比值比（OR）=2.174，95%置信区间（CI） 1.012～4.672］、伤口长度（OR=5.224，95%CI 1.936～14.100）、损伤区域Ⅲ区（OR=4.064，95%CI 1.517～10.884）、损伤类型眼内异物（OR=3.236，95%CI 1.425～7.350）、合并眼内炎（OR=2.879，95%CI 1.346～6.161）均是玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗开放性眼外伤效果的危险因素，手术时机7～14 d（OR=0.225，95%CI 0.064～0.788）是其保护因素（均P<0.05）。结论　术前BCVA、伤口长度、损伤区域、损伤类型、合并眼内炎、手术时机均是玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗开放性眼外伤效果的影响因素。

关键词:

玻璃体切除术, 巩膜扣带术, 开放性眼外伤, 影响因素

Dong Youhui, Zhang Chengxia, Yu Meixia, Xu Kai.

Influencing factors of effect of vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling for patients with open eyeball injury [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(23): 3956-3961.

董有慧张成霞郁美霞徐凯.

玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣带术治疗开放性眼外伤效果的因素研究 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(23): 3956-3961.

References

[1] Zhang Y, Lin MM. Ocular hypertension and glaucoma after open globe injury[J]. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 2024,64(2):63-73.DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000493.
[2] 卢海,刘敬花. 正确认识儿童开放性眼外伤诊疗的复杂性,不断提高其诊疗效果[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2021,37(5):333-337. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20210512- 00250.
[3] Perez EA, Scott NL, Russell JF. Improved visual outcomes after severe open-globe injuries associated with perioperative vitreoretinal evaluation[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2023,7(9):771-778. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret. 2023.04.015.
[4] 袁芳兰,刘身文. 开放性眼外伤早期行玻璃体切除术的可行性及意义[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(5):904-906. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.5.37.
[5] 赵粟,郝晓艳,姚昱呈,等. 25 G玻璃体切割术联合巩膜扣带术治疗眼球内异物伴视网膜脱离的临床效果[J]. 贵州医科大学学报,2021,46(9):1065-1069. DOI:10.19367/j.cnki.2096-8388.2021.09.013.
[6] 田超伟,王雨生,马文霞,等. 玻璃体切除术和巩膜扣带术治疗非后极部裂孔人工晶状体眼视网膜脱离[J]. 临床眼科杂志,2020,28(1):25-29. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8422. 2020.01.007.
[7] 中华医学会眼科学分会眼外伤学组. 中国眼外伤急诊救治规范专家共识(2019年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2019,55(9):647-651. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081. 2019. 09.004.
[8] Bullock JD, Warwar RE. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe)[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1998,125(4):565-566.DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)80206-2.
[9] 孙传兴.临床疾病诊断依据治愈好转标准[M].2版.北京:人民军医出版社,1998:586-589.
[10] Dulz S, Dimopoulos V, Katz T,et al. Reliability of the ocular trauma score for the predictability of traumatic and post-traumatic retinal detachment after open globe injury[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021,14(10):1589-1594.DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.10.17.
[11] 詹邶,薛敏,姜丽丽,等. 小剂量曲安奈德在开放性眼外伤合并视网膜脱离患者手术中的应用效果[J]. 安徽医学,2022,43(5):549-552. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399. 2022. 05.012.
[12] 马佳佳,李秋明,鹿晓燕,等. 玻璃体切割联合节段性巩膜扣带术治疗下方孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效观察[J]. 眼科新进展,2023,43(12):979-982. DOI:10.13389/j.cnki.rao. 2023.0194.
[13] Choi S, Park J, Park S,et al. Establishment of a prediction tool for ocular trauma patients with machine learning algorithm[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021,14(12):1941-1949.DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.20.
[14] 付庆毓,刘添添,王平平,等. 4526例开放性眼外伤流行病学特点及预后因素影响分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2024,38(2):26-33. DOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770. 0.2023.085.
[15] 周丽娜,姚双双,杜珍妮. 小儿眼外伤发病特点及视力预后影响因素研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(17):3231-3233. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.17.033.
[16] 汤明霞,秦时月,刘钰,等. 开放性眼外伤后感染性眼内炎的相关危险因素[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2022,26(20):89-92. DOI:10.7619/jcmp.20222648.
[17] 中华医学会眼科学分会眼外伤学组. 中国眼内异物伤诊疗专家共识(2021年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2021,57(11):819-824. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210810- 00373.
[18] Sinha AK, Durrani AF, Li KX,et al. Retinal detachments after open-globe injury: risk factors and outcomes[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2024,8(4):340-349.DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.10.008.
[19] 刘珏,许光军,王登学,等. 早期玻璃体切割术治疗开放性眼外伤的预后影响因素[J]. 重庆医科大学学报,2020,45(2):184-188. DOI:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002420.
[20] 张苗,董海莉,张芳妮,等. 开放性眼球损伤伴眼眶骨折患者预后的影响因素分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2023,20(3):100-103. DOI:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.03.23.
[21] 操文莉,陈震,邢怡桥. 1587例机械性眼外伤流行病学特点及预后影响因素分析[J]. 实用预防医学,2021,28(10):1201-1204. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2021.10.013.
[22] Wen X, Yuan M, Li C,et al. Risk factors and prognosis of pediatric open globe injuries without initial light perception[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2021,244(2):165-172.DOI: 10.1159/000513337.
[23] Ojuok E, Uppuluri A, Langer PD,et al. Predictive factors of enucleation after open globe injuries[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2021,259(1):247-255.DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04794-6.
[24] He Y, Zhang L, Wang F,et al. Timing influence on outcomes of vitrectomy for open-globe injury: a prospective randomized comparative study[J]. Retina, 2020,40(4):725-734.DOI: 10.1097/IAE. 0000000000002447.
[25] 刘欣,李文博,纪蒙蒙,等. 显微玻璃体切除术治疗眼外伤合并眼内异物的效果分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(8):969-972. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2023.08.027.
[26] 刘永浩,路艳艳,于红影,等. 开放性眼球外伤视力预后相关因素的研究进展[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2021,23(7):552-557. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20200713- 00294.
[27] 朱睿,魏巍. 舒适护理在眼外伤围手术期的应用分析[J]. 中国药物与临床,2020,20(22):3882-3883. DOI:10.11655/zgywylc2020.22.086.
[28] 范凌志,周瑜. 不同玻璃体切割时机对复杂性眼外伤患者预后的影响[J]. 海军医学杂志,2020,41(4):449-451. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2020.04.033.
[29] 罗云霞,田敏,向小红,等. 25 G微创玻璃体切除术治疗眼内异物的疗效及术后视力的影响因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志,2020,20(5):896-900. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123. 2020.5.35.