Effect of local ice pack cold compress combined with infrared radiation for patients with inguinal hernia after surgery

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2024.19.033

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To study the clinical effect of local ice pack cold compress combined with infrared radiation for patients with inguinal hernia after surgery. Methods　A total of 88 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgical treatment at the Guangzhou First People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected. The patients were divided into a control group and a treatment group according to different postoperative treatments, with 44 cases in each group. In the control group, there were 39 males and 5 females; the time from onset to surgery was (6.35±0.52) d; they were (49.43±2.89) years old; there were 17 cases of left inguinal hernia and 27 cases of right inguinal hernia; they were treated with sandbags and infrared radiation after surgery. In the treatment group, there were 37 males and 7 females; the time from onset to surgery was (6.16±0.79) d; they were (49.16±2.73) years old; there were 18 cases of left inguinal hernia and 26 cases of right inguinal hernia; they were treated with local ice pack cold compress and infrared radiation after surgery. Both groups were treated for 1 week. The therapeutic effects and the relevant evaluation indexes before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. χ² and independent sample t test were used for statistical comparison. Results　The total effective rate of incision healing in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group [93.18% (41/44) vs. 75.00% (33/44)], with a statistical difference between the two groups (χ²=5.436, P=0.020). After the treatment, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale and comfort, the levels of interleukin (IL) -10 and C reaction protein, and white blood cell count in the treatment group were better than those in the control group [(1.23±0.08) vs. (5.30±0.25), (18.39±2.17) vs. (15.24±2.25), (4.32±1.08) ng/L vs. (6.95±2.16) ng/L, (4.43±1.68) ng/L vs. (6.16±2.05) ng/L, and (4.13±0.75)×10⁹/L vs. (7.75±1.62)×10⁹/L], with statistical differences (all P<0.05). The incidences of delayed wound healing, wound infection, and wound bleeding in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group [2.27% (1/44) vs. 20.45% (9/44), 0 vs. 11.36% (5/44), and 2.27% (1/44) vs. 18.18% (8/44)], with statistical differences (all P<0.05). The number of incision dressing changes in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group [(3.67±1.29) times vs. (6.98±1.53) times], with a statistical difference (P<0.05). The incision healing time and the total hospitalization time in the treatment group were shorter than those in the control group [(6.10±1.42) d vs. (9.24±1.61) d and (4.29±1.24) d vs. (8.62±2.55) d], with statistical differences (both P<0.05). In the treatment group, 36 cases had grade Ⅰ bleeding, 8 grade Ⅱ, and 0 grade Ⅲ; in the control group, 18 cases had grade Ⅰ bleeding, 19 grade Ⅱ, and 7 grade Ⅲ; there was a statistical difference (all P<0.05). Conclusion　Local ice pack cold compress combined with infrared radiation for patients with inguinal hernia after surgery can effectively control wound dressing bleeding, reduce dressing changes, inflammatory reactions, and pain level, shorten wound healing time, and hospitalization time, and improve comfort.

Key words:

Inguinal hernia, Local ice pack cold compress, Infrared irradiation, Comfort, Incision healing

摘要：

目的　探讨腹股沟斜疝患者在手术后采用切口局部冰袋冷敷联合红外线照射治疗的临床效果。方法　采用回顾性分析，选择2021年1月至2022年12月在广州市第一人民医院接受手术治疗的腹股沟斜疝患者88例，按照术后处理方式不同分为对照组和治疗组。对照组44例，男39例、女5例，发病至手术时间（6.35±0.52）d，年龄（49.43±2.89）岁；左侧腹股沟疝17例、右侧腹股沟疝27例；术后接受砂袋+红外线照射治疗。治疗组44例，男37例、女7例，发病至手术时间（6.16±0.79）d，年龄（49.16±2.73）岁，左侧腹股沟疝18例、右侧腹股沟疝26例；术后接受切口局部冰袋冷敷联合红外线照射治疗。两组均治疗1周。对比两组治疗效果及治疗前后的相关评价指标。统计比较采用χ²检验、独立样本t检验。结果　治疗组患者切口愈合总有效率为93.18%（41/44），高于对照组的75.00%（33/44），差异有统计学意义（χ²=5.436，P=0.020）；治疗后，治疗组视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分为（1.23±0.08）分、舒适度评分为（18.39±2.17）分、白细胞介素（IL）-10为（4.32±1.08）ng/L、C反应蛋白（CRP）（4.43±1.68）ng/L、白细胞计数（WBC）为（4.13±0.75）×10⁹/L，对照组分别为（5.30±0.25）分、（15.24±2.25）分、（6.95±2.16）ng/L、（6.16±2.05）ng/L、（7.75±1.62）×10⁹/L，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；治疗组切口延迟愈合发生率为2.27%（1/44）、切口感染发生率为0、切口渗血发生率为2.27%（1/44），均低于对照组［20.45%（9/44）、11.36%（5/44）、18.18%（8/44）］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；治疗组切口换药次数［（3.67±1.29）次］少于对照组［（6.98±1.53）次］，切口愈合时间［（6.10±1.42）d］、住院总时间［（4.29±1.24）d］短于对照组［（9.24±1.61）d、（8.62±2.55）d］，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）；治疗组切口敷料渗血Ⅰ级36例、Ⅱ级8例、Ⅲ级0例，对照组分别为18例、19例、7例，差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论　腹股沟斜疝患者在手术后采用切口局部冰袋冷敷联合红外线照射治疗效果显著，可有效控制切口敷料渗血，减少换药次数，减轻炎症反应和疼痛程度，缩短切口愈合和住院时间，提高舒适度。

关键词:

腹股沟斜疝, 局部冰袋冷敷, 红外线照射, 舒适度, 切口愈合

Fan Yijin, He Ying, Huang Yuhua.

Effect of local ice pack cold compress combined with infrared radiation for patients with inguinal hernia after surgery [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2024, 30(19): 3327-3331.

范意金何映黄玉花.

切口局部冰袋冷敷联合红外线照射在腹股沟斜疝术后中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2024, 30(19): 3327-3331.

References

[1] 陈英,李朝,冯晨,等. TAPP术治疗成年男性腹股沟斜疝与直疝术后血清肿的发生率[J]. 西南国防医药,2020,30(1):43-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2020.01.016.
[2] 贺静如,董亚利,戴美玲. 手术室护理干预在预防胃肠道手术患者切口感染的临床效果分析[J]. 贵州医药,2020,44(11):1837-1838. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000- 744X. 2020.11.083.
[3] 李晶.对全膝关节置换术后采用生物冰袋冷敷的止血和止疼效果进行观察分析[J/CD].临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(15):40.DOI:10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2020.15.034.
[4] 刘彩燕. 切口局部冷敷联合疝气袋干预对腹股沟斜疝患者术后切口疼痛、出血及舒适度的影响[J]. 医疗装备,2019,32(24):185-186. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376. 2019.24.124.
[5] 钟金兰. 细节化手术室护理干预对腹部手术患者预防切口感染及应激反应的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志,2021,50(20):2967-2969. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.20.041.
[6] 宗莉萍,张倩,杨春. 优质护理干预对胃肠道手术患者术后疼痛、恢复和切口感染的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2020,17(4):241-243. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170. 2020.04.073.
[7] 刘世舜,山洁,董美玉,等. 红外线照射治疗对剖宫产术后切口感染患者感染控制与微循环改善的作用研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2017,27(2):418-421. DOI:10.11816/cn.ni.2017-162622.
[8] 田晋嗣,兰金耀. 钩针法疝环闭合术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝的临床研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科,2020,25(1):60-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2020.01.029.
[9] 冯套印.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝的临床效果分析[J].河南外科学杂志,2019,25(6):101-102.DOI:10.16193/j.cnki.hnwk.2019.06.055.
[10] Ali-Mohamad N, Cau M, Baylis J, et al. Severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding is halted by endoscopically delivered self-propelling thrombin powder: a porcine pilot study[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2021,9(5):E693-E698. DOI: 10.1055/a-1374-5839.
[11] Minor RL, Maley T, Jenkins D, Li YH. Randomized trial of vasostat versus TR band following radial artery access for catheterization procedures[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2021,33(2):E84-E90.
[12] 程建民. 冰袋冷敷在四肢骨折创伤的早期应用[J/CD]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2019,19(14):261-262. DOI:10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2019.14.188.
[13] 段建平,朱林春,李志刚,等. 单孔腹腔镜联合ERAS策略在小儿腹股沟斜疝中的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(5):578-580. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.05.030.
[14] 蔡多特,高志刚,章立峰,等. 关于腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝术后再发斜疝的经验总结[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志,2020,41(10):914-918. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20190712- 00432.
[15] 葛月兰. 健康管理联合腹腔镜对小儿腹股沟疝手术患儿术后VAS评分、儿童QOL评分及康复质量的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(8):1380-1382. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.08.005.
[16] 李珂,张镟,段守兴,等. 快速康复外科护理在小儿腹股沟斜疝围手术期中管理的应用[J]. 护理管理杂志,2019,19(11):824-827. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2019.11.015.
[17] 黄小惠,肖鑫,周金标,等. 腹腔镜下单通道腹膜外高位结扎术治疗儿童腹股沟疝的临床效果及对血清CRP水平的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(21):4124-4127. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.21.070.
[18] 张株惠,谢晓华,张子敬,等.加味补中益气汤促进腹腔镜腹股沟疝补片修补术后康复的疗效观察[J].广州中医药大学学报,2020,37(4):627-631.DOI:10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2020.04.008.
[19] 黄文,叶钿均,林贾颖,等. 单孔法腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的疗效分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2021,16(27):4-7. DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2021.27.002.
[20] 涂学广.经脐单孔腹腔镜与开放式疝囊高位结扎术治疗腹股沟斜疝患儿的临床疗效[J/CD].现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2021,5(18):36-38.
[21] 韩玉洁 . 加速康复外科理念在小儿腹股沟斜疝脐部切口腹腔镜手术围术期的应用效果 [J]. 河南外科学杂志 ,2021,27(5):144-145.
[22] Al-Ahmad A, Mittal S, DeLurgio D, et al. Results from the prospective, multicenter AMBULATE-CAP trial: Reduced use of urinary catheters and protamine with hemostasis via the Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure System (VASCADE® MVP) following multi-access cardiac ablation procedures[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2021,32(2):191-199. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14828.