Application effect of whole-body vibration training in stroke patients with hemiplegia

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.11.022

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effects of whole-body vibration training on the balance function, fall risk, and quality of life in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods　It was a randomized controlled trial. By the random number table method, 104 stroke patients with hemiplegia admitted to Weihai Central Hospital from January 2020 to September 2022 were divided into a control group (52 cases) and a study group (52 cases). The control group consisted of 31 males and 21 females, aged (63.06±6.54) years. The study group consisted of 29 males and 23 females, aged (63.37±6.59) years. The control group received clinical routine rehabilitation therapy + sham whole-body vibration training, while the study group received clinical routine rehabilitation therapy + whole-body vibration training. The patients' balance function was evaluated by the front-back tilt angle (F-BIA), left-right tilt angle (L-RIA), and standing time of the affected side. The patients' fall risk was assessed by the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale (MFS). The patients' quality of life was assessed by the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74). The balance function, fall risk, and quality of life were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The measurement data were compared by two independent samples t-test and paired t-test, and the count data were compared by four grid table χ² test. Results　After treatment, the F-BIA, L-RIA, and standing time of the affected side were all higher than those before treatment in both groups, and those in the study group were higher than those in the control group [(1.37±0.76)° vs. (1.03±0.62)°, (3.24±1.36)° vs. (2.11±1.03)°, (4.58±2.17) s vs. (3.12±1.43) s] (all P<0.05). After treatment, the MFS scores in both groups were lower than those before treatment [(31.07±4.12) points vs. (82.57±8.67) points, (43.54±5.26) points vs. (82.15±8.62) points] (both P<0.05), and the MFS score in the study group was lower than that in the control group (t=13.458, P<0.001). After treatment, the scores of physical function, psychological function, material function, and social function and total score of quality of life in both groups were higher than those before treatment, and those in the study group were higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion　Compared with conventional rehabilitation therapy, combined whole-body vibration training can significantly improve the balance function in stroke patients with hemiplegia, reduce their fall risk, and improve their quality of life, which has clinical promotion value.

Key words:

Stroke, Hemiplegia, Whole-body vibration training, Balance function, Fall risk, Quality of life

摘要：

目的　探讨全身振动训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者平衡功能、跌倒风险及生活质量的影响。方法　本研究为随机对照试验。按照随机数字表法将2020年1月至2022年9月威海市中心医院收治的104例脑卒中偏瘫患者分为对照组和研究组，每组52例。对照组男31例，女21例，年龄（63.06±6.54）岁，接受临床常规康复治疗+假性全身振动训练；研究组男29例，女23例，年龄（63.37±6.59）岁，接受临床常规康复治疗+全身振动训练。采用前后倾斜角度（F-BIA）、左右倾斜角度（L-RIA）、患侧单腿站立时间评估患者平衡功能，采用Morse跌倒风险评估量表（MFS）评估患者跌倒风险，采用生活质量综合评定问卷（GQOLI-74）评估患者生活质量。比较治疗前后两组患者的平衡功能、跌倒风险、生活质量。计量资料采用两独立样本t检验及配对t检验比较，计数资料用四格表χ²检验比较。结果　治疗后，两组F-BIA、L-RIA、患侧单腿站立时间均高于同组治疗前，且研究组均高于对照组［（1.37±0.76）°比（1.03±0.62）°、（3.24±1.36）°比（2.11±1.03）°、（4.58±2.17）s比（3.12±1.43）s］（均P<0.05）；两组MFS评分均低于同组治疗前［（31.07±4.12）分比（82.57±8.67）分、（43.54±5.26）分比（82.15±8.62）分］（均P<0.05），且研究组低于对照组（t=13.458，P<0.001）；两组躯体功能、心理功能、物质功能、社会功能评分及生活质量总分均高于同组治疗前，研究组均高于对照组（均P<0.05）。结论　与常规康复治疗相比，联合全身振动训练可以明显改善脑卒中偏瘫患者的平衡功能，降低跌倒风险，提高生活质量，有临床推广价值。

关键词:

脑卒中, 偏瘫, 全身振动训练, 平衡功能, 跌倒风险, 生活质量

Jiang Hengwei, Yu Liying, You Jian, Zheng Qian.

Application effect of whole-body vibration training in stroke patients with hemiplegia [J]. International Medicine and Health Guidance News, 2023, 29(11): 1578-1582.

姜恒蔚于丽瑛由健郑茜.

全身振动训练在脑卒中偏瘫患者中的应用效果 [J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(11): 1578-1582.

References

[1] 党芳萍,李惠菊,田金徽,等. 我国脑卒中偏瘫患者康复护理研究的可视化分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(5):584-587. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.05.018.
[2] 谢碧灵,邹沁,田玉. 肌电生物反馈联合康复训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能和生活质量的临床研究[J]. 川北医学院学报,2020,35(2):350-353. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005- 3697.2020.02.045.
[3] 张玉婷,汪杰,吕雪莹,等. 跑台扰动训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者平衡功能及跌倒风险的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2022,37(5):636-641. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2022. 05.011.
[4] 龚迪,王雪强,王惠芳. 全身振动训练在内科康复中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复,2018,33(5):517-520. DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2018.05.022.
[5] 金振华,陈玲,叶祥明. 全身振动训练对脑卒中患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2019,25(3):347-351. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006?9771.2019.03.018.
[6] Ruhde L, Hulla R. An overview of the effects of whole-body vibration on individuals with cerebral palsy[J]. J Pediatr Rehabil Med,2022,15(1):193-210. DOI: 10.3233/PRM-201508.
[7] Cigdem Karacay B, Sahbaz T, Gurtekin B, et al. Effectiveness of whole-body vibration exercise and core stabilization exercise in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized-controlled study[J]. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil, 2022, 68(2): 184-194. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.7060.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.
[9] 林嘉琪,吴桂丽. Morse跌倒风险评估量表的临床应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报,2018,25(13):42-45. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.13.042.
[10] 李小姣. 反馈式康复护理对卒中后偏瘫患者生活质量综合评定问卷-74评分的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志,2021,50(9):1579-1581. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2021.09.071.
[11] 王金环. 脑卒中防治亟需技术与理念的创新[J]. 中国综合临床,2021,37(4):291-293. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101721- 20210615-00040.
[12] 高琼珠,夏结婷,李亚洁,等. 不同时机营养干预对急性脑卒中预后的临床影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(2):213-215. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.02.019.
[13] 梁钊明,古剑雄,陈向梅,等. 肩三针联合体外冲击波对脑卒中后肩痛病人疼痛程度及运动功能的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2020,18(9):1375-1378. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2020.09.007.
[14] 郭莉娟,郑诺莹,宋朝晖. Pro-Kin平衡训练联合芒针透刺督脉组穴对脑卒中后偏瘫患者运动功能及跌倒风险的影响[J]. 海南医学,2022,33(3):284-287. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2022.03.003.
[15] Küçük EB, Küçük E, Kaydok E, et al. Dry eye in chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia: a cross-sectional study[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2020, 27(8): 630-635. DOI:10.1080/10749357.2020.1757347.
[16] 王身芳,王身林,李长君,等. 全身振动训练联合肌电生物反馈治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者康复的影响[J]. 护理学杂志,2021,36(9):16-18. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021. 09.016.
[17] 杨德洪,吴雪萍. 全身振动训练对脑瘫患者的干预效果[J]. 上海体育学院学报,2018,42(2):100-108. DOI:10.16099/j.sus.2018.02.014.
[18] 何雯雯,傅建明,李岩,等. 全身振动训练对脑卒中患者膝过伸的疗效分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(2):207-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2019.02.017.
[19] 吴艳,傅登群,严小览. 全身振动训练对脑卒中恢复期患者上肢功能的影响[J]. 重庆医学,2022,51(11):1886-1889. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2022.11.017.
[20] 刘志红,梁鲁波,史涛涛,等. 全身振动训练对后循环梗死患者平衡功能影响的研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(2):273-275. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021. 02.031.
[21] 李岩,何雯雯,董燕飞,等. 全身振动训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者本体感觉及平衡功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(6):709-712. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2021. 06.013.
[22] Xie L, Yi SX, Peng QF, et al. Retrospective study of effect of whole-body vibration training on balance and walking function in stroke patients[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(22): 6268-6277. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6268.
[23] 王雪强,胡浩宇,郑依莉,等. 全身振动训练治疗腰痛的研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2018,33(9):1113-1117. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2018.09.024.
[24] 肖悦,许光旭,曹蓉,等. 全身振动训练促进脑卒中偏瘫患者平衡功能和步行效率的研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2020,42(4):312-316. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424. 2020.04.005.
[25] 胡川,杨晓,顾莹,等. 全身振动训练对脑卒中后偏瘫病人步行功能的影响[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2022,20(2):337-340. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2022.02.035.
[26] 李宏波,周谋望. 全身振动训练对亚急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(9):1055-1060. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.09.006.
[27] 陈红,黄雨滟,黄厚强. 不同频率的全身振动训练对脑卒中患者平衡功能及步行功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(16):2160-2163. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021. 16.026.
[28] Yang F, Butler AJ. Efficacy of controlled whole-body vibration training on improving fall risk factors in stroke survivors: a meta-analysis[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2020, 34(4): 275-288. DOI:10.1177/1545968320907073.
[29] Sierra-Guzmán R, Jiménez-Diaz F, Ramírez C, et al. Whole-body-vibration training and balance in recreational athletes with chronic ankle instability[J]. J Athl Train, 2018, 53(4): 355-363. DOI 10.4085/1062- 6050-547-16.
[30] 朱晓凤. 不同频率全身振动训练对老年人平衡和核心稳定性的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2020,26(3):291-294. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.03.005.